2007 Deadliest Year Since 1989 for Police Officers

You can read the full story here.

These crimes are mostly by legally born Americans, but children with no upbringing, usually because of divorce, and no interest or care for the children....and, thus, children who become entrapped to their so called "friends" within the community related to law-breaking gangs.

This is more reason why we need a much more strict code of justice, for those who want to commit crimes against humanity. Otherwise the crime rate will just continue to rise beyond the point that any means of civility will be impossible. In effect, turning our country into a full blown civil war.

There's that side of it, but on the other side, of equal importance, is a much larger factor, or threat, if you will...

Now, much to the jargon of the Left, about Islam being the "religion of peace" and everything, we see quite the opposite picture with last week's chain of events at the passing of Benazir Bhutto. This, combined with a rising number of Moslems, and terrorist threats against the United States by them, does not spell good news.

How we take steps to address these issues will decide how the country as a whole can move forward, by making America safe once again. The first step, I believe, is in the immigration issue, we must reduce immigration from Nations such as Iran, Syria, and the surrounding territories. And to that effect, we reduce the likeliehood of terrorists getting into the U.S., and thus, thwart future terrorist attacks. That's the first step.

Secondly, we have to deal with those that are already in the country--thus, we must tighten down on the activities of those who practice the Islamic religion; by making ourselves more aware of what plans and events that are being carried out in the Moslem gathering centers. Although, we do have the wiretapping programs in place, it can't cover what the ears can't hear, and the eyes can't see. So, there must be some intelligence in place that can monitor the activities of these areas. If cameras are necessary, then so be it. The benefits will far outweigh the risks in this case.

What we do beyond this, regarding the situation of our Native citizenry who commit crimes against humanity, will have to be taken into consideration after a review of the current laws on the books. Now, I know I can't make that decision, for I'm not well versed on procedure, but it seems to me, that far too much time is spent in the Court room, on present cases, and less time on bringing justice to our streets. The reason I say this, is because I have to go by what the great Judges and Kings of Old had to say about the issue, in which case, they were guidance came from the Supreme Judge...For example, In the book of Ecclesiasties 8:11-by King Solomon-

When the sentence for a crime is not quickly carried out, the hearts of the people are filled with schemes to do wrong. Although a wicked man commits a hundred crimes and still lives a long time, I know that it will go better with God-fearing men, who are reverent before God.

So, with the present crime wave, we can only presume one thing, and that, to be precise, our justice system is delivering, purposfully, partiality, on behalf of their own wants and desires; and not for the benefit of the people and their neighborhoods.

How can this be? How could our elected officials be hoodwinked by their own appointees like this?

It all boils down to this one fact - Activist Liberalism. Yes, Liberalism, in its pleasing, deceiving message, has blinded the people eyes to the reality around them. They say? If I can swindle the government every month, "who cares"?

See?

If there was ever a disaster to befall this country, it was whenever welfare and other entitlement programs were enacted enslaving the people to our own government and not putting them to work to help themselves. Just simply put, it is Socialism. Thus, we have created more dead-beat parents, which leads to the fact of increased rates of crime, and furthermore, increased promiscuity and abortions.

Don't you see, folks, governmental dependency is adding to our problems, not fixing them.

This is the way it should be, in the order as follows...

1. Eliminate welfare and other entitlements = increase in working families = more responsibility = better raised children = less crime.

In that order.

Have at it...

~ Jeremiah

An Issue of Immigration

Special Thanks goes to my little brother for this contributing post.

Immigration is an ever growing threat to our country, and in times like these we need a person in office who can stand with unwaivering resolve to confront the threat and take it head on. The Conservative party is known for it's resolution to try and make the odds as best as possible for ALL Americans, and when I say all I even mean the ones who weren't born here but have gone through the system and pledged their loyalty with that desire in their heart to be true, heartfelt, dedicated Americans. Committed to pursuing the American dream of providing for themselves and their families, and living decent moral lives.

But in todays Conservative line up, we find a few questionable records, a few men that ... if you take a hard look at their record you'll find some gaping cracks that could come to be fatal weak spots in their armor. Never the less, we have to get to the core of the issues, because threats to America must be faced head on, and we need a fully armored candidate who we know can face the conflict without a flinch when push comes to shove.

So ... just who stands where?

Romney: Has been known to hire companies to do his personal bidding that have active workers who are illegal immigrants, as we found in the last Republican debate. Courtesy of Mayor Rudy. While not something that Romney can control per se, it is something he definitely should have confronted and have took a stand on.

Romney never denied the allegations of hiring these companies, but he never really took a stand as to whether or not he confronted them, the Supervisors/Bosses, about. All-in-all, it's a case of illegals effectively stealing a job(s) that could have significantly helped a not so fortunate family(s). He made his case as to not really having control over what types of people companies hire, but it gives no explanation as to why he didn't confront the head people involved about it... One crack in the armor.

Mayor Rudy: Effectively created a city of refuge out of New York city for any and all illegals who came there. They received free health care at the drop of a hat when they got involved in street brawls/shootings, and not a word was mentioned otherwise. It was dust swept under the rug, and I'm sure he never thought that skeleton would ever drop out of the closet. During the debate, Mayor Rudy acted like a cornered cat when the issue came up. For the first time we seen an effective public speaker, one who had been through fire and brim stone during 9/11, begin to stutter and stammer as he tried to give explanation as to why he created a harbor city for people who should not be in this country.

While I don't believe it's ethical to let any man die due to injuries received from a fight where two people are involved, I don't believe it's right to let such people go off scott-free after they've been handled with kid gloves in hospitals that are held to high standards, American Standards. These people should have been turned over to the authorities for the proper handling procedures, and have been put in the line of people going through the naturalization process.

I guess Rudy didn't seem to think so... A gaping crack in the armor.

Huckabee: Never really got questioned about the issue, and so far hasn't really been pinned down about it. Why? Well, the only natural explanation seems to be that he's stood firm where it counts, and he's confronted the issues when they came to knock. He performed well during his tenures in public office, and honestly he seems to be one of, if not the best, for President when it comes to this issue.

Huckabee is a man of standard, his armor has stood the test of time and he's not let the enemy strike a blow against him.

Thompson: Has taken a strong and decisive stand on the issue and has pointed out the weakness and problems with past failed attempts to solve this ever increasing threat against America. In a bully-pulpit fashion interview with the National Review recently, he told it straight up and no holds barred. 'No matter how much lipstick you try to slap on this legislative pig, it isn't going to win any beauty contests' and I don't believe anyone has said it better. The issue, at the core, is downright ugly. It has to be faced, and it has to be done now.

Thompson's approach is a good one, and I believe he has readied his armor well for the fight. Let's hope that should he get the nomination, he can follow through on his words.

R. Paul: Seems to have a disconnection with reality. In past debates he has proposed some off the wall theories. In all honesty, I don't know if he plans to go into this thing suited up in armor or if he plans to try and sneak in the back way in his stockings with a butter knife.

Given his whole disconnection with reality, I don't really know if his stand on this issue is going to be a make it or break it one.

McCain: Wants to give temporary Visas to illegals and give them a whack at jobs that would otherwise be bringing income to needy American men, women and their families. He and Ted Kennedy brain stormed the bill to do it to boot... I think McCain forgot his breast-plate at home when it comes to this issue.

The American people want an end to the job stealing, plain and simple. I'm afraid McCain better re-think his stance. Because temporary visas are going to lead to permanent ruination if we don't stop it.

Tancredo: Is Die hard against it, and is even part of a group of people who call themselves 'The Leauge of the South'. Tancredo wants to work toward a common objective of all Americans, secure the fence. His rallying and his stance are a good testimony of his dedication to stopping the beast before it gets out of hand if he gets in office... Tancredo is suited with a thick set of armor.

Lastly...

Hunter: Has a track record that is straight and true. He's helped to build fences in the So. Cal area where immigrants like to get across. He's done more than talk, he has performed. He's shown to be a guy of dedication when it comes to securing our borders and trying to help preserve jobs for willing to work Americans. Hunter looks to be a great man for the job, we need a guy who is willing to take control of the situation and give him the authority to build big fences not only in San Diego but in all areas of weakness on the border.

The battle has only just begun, it's going to be interesting to see how this pans out in the future. As for me, all my bets are on Mike Huckabee.

Courtesy of Jeremiah's brother.

Thanks, Bro!

America's Workforce And Illegal Immigration

From the late 1980s to the present, there has been an explosion of illegal immigrants crossing our borders into California and Florida, some, if not most of them looking for a better life with the ability to be able to put food on the table for their families. However, over the past twelve to fourteen years, there has been a tremendous influx of drug trafficing from Mexico across our borders and into the hands of drug peddlers. Recent reports have shown that heroine mixed with tylenol is mixed to create a deadly toxic drug called "cheese" that has been sold to school children as young as eight and ten years old. Along with the smuggling of drugs into America comes the issue of job opportunities for millions of American families, which are taken instead by illegals through the outsourcing and underbidding of those potential jobs. Many of the metropolitan cities in our Nation have now become sancturaries and havens for immigrants to remain here by illegal status, in total disregard for American law, which would lead statistics to prove that the majority of metro-crime is related to illegals.

Does politics play a part in the issue of immigration?

You can bet it does!

Who is responsible?

You got it...Democrats, who have given amnesty to millions upon millions of those who should otherwise not be here, and even amnesty isn't enough to satisfy Democrats. Democrats have found prime victims in pandering to illegal immigrants in order to get potential voters.

How are they doing it?

They want to provide illegal immigrants with Social Security, Welfare, SSI (Supplemental Security Income), Disability benefits (If an illegal stumps their big toe, they get disability), Healthcare ("Free" healthcare they claim), and SChip which covers all the healthcare benefits. Not to mention $5,000 to all children born to illegal immigrants here.

Who's going to pay for all that? Guess who ... YOU!

Now, I don't know about you, but I don't think this would go very well with America in a time that Islamo-fascists want to seek no less than to wipe America off the face of the earth, not to mention the fact that Democrats want to stop this noble war, and put every American family all 300,000,000 million of us under the threat of mass chaos and destruction like we have never seen before.

It's time that all conerned Americans wake up and realize what a crisis this Naton is in, and seriously concider this next election as their opportunity to start America on the course for Victory and start turning back to God for the guidance and the strength to move America toward hope, and dedicating themselves to their families and raising their chidren in the admonition of the Lord.

God bless!

~Jeremiah

Help in disguise!

Democrats want to override the President's authority!

"An important component of the leftist class warfare agenda is to condemn President Bush's tax cuts for the rich. This claim is careless, ignorant or dishonest on at least two counts. First there's the constitutional issue. Article I, Section 8 reads, "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes . . ." That means the president has no taxing authority.
Presidents can propose or veto taxes and Congress can override vetoes. The bottom line is that all taxing authority rests with the U.S. Congress. The next time you hear someone condemn or praise Bush's tax cuts, ask them whether the Constitution has been amended to give the president taxing authority."

Very true! While President Bush has done a grand job of reducing taxation ... Our Democrat congress in just the opposite manner, want to increase the amount of taxation to obscene amounts and then redistribute it to families who could otherwise work, but choose not too, and a larger percentage of these are those of illegal entry status, who enter the country in total disregard for the American law and total disrespect for American life.

We do need tougher immigration law, and one way to do this, is to deport many of them back to their original grounds, in other words--If they entered illegaly but in some way have gotten an amnesty pass--they should be returned regardless. We have laws, and those laws need to be abided by.

Democrats will go at any extreme to get power, and this is a classic example, in that they are buying their votes...they don't care about principle or rule of law, they just want -- Power!!

Socialism will never work, because Communism would be soon to follow.

America! You need to think about these things before you act in this next, and one of the most important elections in our Nation's history coming up!