Sarah Palin: A Step Towards True Science

Upon browsing the media for a little bit, I apparently receive this bit of information on what Sarah Palin thinks of the teaching of creationism (or intelligent design, if you have to subscribe to politically correct gobbledygook):

On Aug. 29, the Boston Globe reported that Palin was open to teaching creationism in public schools. That's true. She supports teaching creationism alongside evolution, though she has not actively pursued such a policy as governor.

In an Oct. 25, 2006, debate, when asked about teaching alternatives to evolution, Palin replied:

Palin, Oct. 25, 2006: Teach both. You know, don't be afraid of information. Healthy debate is so important and it's so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both. And you know, I say this too as the daughter of a science teacher. Growing up with being so privileged and blessed to be given a lot of information on, on both sides of the subject – creationism and evolution. It's been a healthy foundation for me. But don't be afraid of information and let kids debate both sides.

A couple of days later, Palin amended that statement in an interview with the Anchorage Daily News, saying:

Palin, Oct. 2006: I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum.

After her election, Palin let the matter drop. The Associated Press reported Sept 3: "Palin's children attend public schools and Palin has made no push to have creationism taught in them. ... It reflects a hands-off attitude toward mixing government and religion by most Alaskans." The article was headlined, "Palin has not pushed creation science as governor." It was written by Dan Joling, who reports from Anchorage and has covered Alaska for 30 years.

I think that the stance that Sarah Palin takes on the nefarious doctrine of Darwinism may be too gentle, but we have to keep in mind that she is in the field of politics, and if she took a hardline stance on the Truth, she'd have to contend with money raised for Iraq Hussein Osama by the teachers' unions and the scientists' unions. The passionate creationist may think that it would be foolish to compromise the Truth, and that she should come out completely against Darwinism. However, a pragmatical and eucuenemical approach to the situation is that Sarah Palin would probably not receive significantly more funds from her main constituencies that push for it (evangelical churches and organizations), and a hardline stance against Darwinism would undoubtely push the teachers' unions to donate even more money to the Democrats. (Personally, I think that privatizing the schools, or at least allowing school choice, would be the best course of action in the long run; in this way, the teachers' unions won't be able to influence the minds of our children. However, this would be even worse news for Sarah Palin.) (It would be unwise to forget the power the teachers' unions hold over our nation. Thanks to a Democrat Congress, not even the Great Reagan could smash them, and they continue to grow to this day.)

However, Sarah Palin's stance on the issue, even if it fails to completely satisfy our thirsts, is still reasonable, especially when compared to the Darwinists that advocate censorship of any other view that even questions the idiotic belief. Those that dare to take a hardline stance against Darwinism are often persecuted, and people that support Creationist thought are often shut out from secular organizations altogether. Darwinism is firmly ingrained in the lifeblood of our high school and college institutions, and to insinuate that we topple it immediately and with haste would likely end to our untimely demise, with another Kitzmiller v Dover throwing us off our guard.

Instead, Sarah Palin's support of mandating that Creationism at least be allowed to be discussed by the children is much more pragmatic. The mind of a child is a terrible thing to brainwash, and any steps that we can take at all to stop this tragedy would be an excellent thing. Ideally, the children who wish to debate Creationism will be given material that supports Creationism, along with the rest of the class; similarly, in order to appease the Darwinist mongrels, we'll have to give out similar sheets.

In order to get this into our schools, I think that we should have a referendum that allows this measure to be placed in to our schools, with the voting occuring by county. This will allow the most children of the United States to be influence by Creationism. In fact, if we use this method, some counties can even dispose of Darwinism entirely.

A President Palin, and possibly a President McCain influenced by a Vice President Palin, would surely allow at least this referendum to be voted on; a President Osama or a President Hidin would do their darndest to stop it. Now that we have a fairly conservative Supreme Court, they may also make no effort to stop it. As for the legislative, I don't think the Democrats should be permitted, by the law, to attempt to undermine it; after all, they are the ones that believe that the judicial branch should pass the law, and that the legislative branch should not interfere with it (as several of them have expressed over California's Proposition 8, which would rightfully ban gay marriage, and Proposition 4, which would at least require parents to be notified before their disgraceful daughters receive an abortion). If they tried to undermine it via the legislature, I think that a President Palin would call them out.

Under no circumstances would a President Palin mean that the grassroots can stop working to take over school boards, however. What President Palin would do is protect the rights of the grassroots to do what they want to do; a Commie Fascist Obama would work to silence these Americans. The Christian Coalition succeeded because of a combination of grassroots effort and the Republican Party leadership's apathy; the grassroots will be the ones to establish Creationism in our schools, with President Palin fending off the Darwinist hoards that try to steal our children's minds for their loot.

May Creationism reign supreme one day, and may Darwinism be cast into the dustbin of history!

Isaiah 5:20
Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!

Update: THIS is abominable. Those poor children!

Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!

Evolutionists Trying To Eliminate God From Public School

The Florida State Board of Education is getting ready, and is scheduled to vote on Florida's new education policy later today. In the new policy, will include 18 new ideas, but among the 18 new ideas, one of them is going to have perhaps the greatest; or maybe I should say, the most 'negative' impact on Education, if it passes. Evolutionists are demanding that evolution be taught as "fact," as the "fundamental concept underlying all of biology." In the process, blinding the children to the truth of their origination and true hope.

It's as if anything which contradicts and sheds any light on their theory is "false."

The Orlando Sentinel is reporting that parents all across the state have flooded the Board of Education's website denouncing the new science standard, some, even threatening to pull their children from the public school systems.

In response to the new science standard, State representative Marti Coley is drafting legislation that would require that evolution be taught as theory and theory only...and, maybe, hopefully, be able to make it so Creationism, or Intelligent Design could be taught side by side, as an alternative/choice to evolution.

Let's hope the good Christian people of Florida will come out in full force, today, and stand for what is right...stand for truth.

Pray for America!

--Jeremiah--

Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!

The Darwinists: Their Explanation Of Life Dressed Up As "Science".

All theology is Ideology. Which is a tautology introduced by Marx Barth, in which he introduces the concept of Ideology as the production of conceptions, of ideas, and of the consciences. That's quite interesting, as it would relate to the many Ideologies and Theories we as Christians come up against in our Modern Day Culture, a Culture full of Death, Hatred, and Lies!! One of the main underlying problems leading to this distorted elixir of beliefs and ideologies we find in our Modern world, is that there is a lacking of profound basic understanding of origins in which the materialistic objects actually orgininated, in which many have fallen for not just a misconception but a complete lie, nothing more, nothing less--that all we see, hear, and feel came from--"nothingness". How do people come to such ideological inconsistencies? Down through the ages there have been many philosophers who have strived to perceive, and expound their own ideological, theoretical answers to the past tense of all existence on Earth as we know it. One of the most influential minds in the history of science was Charles Darwin, who lived from 1809-1882--Charles Darwin started the movement we call today known as "Darwinianism", which has lead to the widely conceived notion that all life "Descended from former existing life forms". Can this work? The answer is simply, No! It cannot!

How do the Darwinians explain the former existence of life forms?
If the current life forms are "mutations" of the former life forms, then why are the former life forms not already extinct? Many Scientists, have tried to use the many geological records as proof of "changing" life, but it is an affront and contradiction to the more common sense approach, which we Christians hold that, All geological records have consistently shown that the life forms in which we make new discoveries, are perserved in exactly the same size and shape as the current life we see today, such as the mollusks, mosquitos, birds, and many other life forms that are preserved within the sedimentary rock that was a result of Man's disobedience, and is the proof of God's Wrath, God had to destroy sinful man, by submerging the earth with a Great Flood of water--Genesis 6:7--"I will wipe mankind, whom I have created, from the face of the earth--men and animals, and creatures that move along the ground, and birds of the air--for I am grieved that I have made them."

Now, we have Creation, and we have Darwinism--as the different views come into conflict with each other, this is where it leads to the Culture of Death, simply because many believe because of Darwin's misleading propaganda, that life, human life within the womb--Is "not human". What Idiocy!!!!

If life in the womb of a woman were not human, then there would be no consistency for progress in our Modern day culture, civilization would cease to exist!! Millions of people have been born, worked, and helped build the Nation and world into what it is today. So, my question to the Darwinists--How would all of this possible, if we are not human in the womb????

Life within the womb "is not human" is merely a blasphemous notion of Atheists who believe Satan's deceiving lie!!!

You see, as Scientists continue to labor for the answers in all their many findings and discoveries, they fail to realize--"I am looking at the workings of the Creator".

God is the Science behind Science!!!

God's hand is at work in all we see, and all we do!!

God justifies every living thing, He says, 'From dust you came, to dust you shall return.' It is God's place to give and to take away!

He gave us Life because He loves us, the reason He takes life away, is because He placed a curse upon mankind for sin, but He loved us so much that He sent His One and Only Son to die on the Cross at Calvary where He shed His precious blood for our transgressions, and to provide a way back to the Father that we might have Life not just in the here and now, but for Eternity with Him in Heaven!!

God bless!
Jeremiah