Sarah Palin: A Step Towards True Science

Upon browsing the media for a little bit, I apparently receive this bit of information on what Sarah Palin thinks of the teaching of creationism (or intelligent design, if you have to subscribe to politically correct gobbledygook):

On Aug. 29, the Boston Globe reported that Palin was open to teaching creationism in public schools. That's true. She supports teaching creationism alongside evolution, though she has not actively pursued such a policy as governor.

In an Oct. 25, 2006, debate, when asked about teaching alternatives to evolution, Palin replied:

Palin, Oct. 25, 2006: Teach both. You know, don't be afraid of information. Healthy debate is so important and it's so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both. And you know, I say this too as the daughter of a science teacher. Growing up with being so privileged and blessed to be given a lot of information on, on both sides of the subject – creationism and evolution. It's been a healthy foundation for me. But don't be afraid of information and let kids debate both sides.

A couple of days later, Palin amended that statement in an interview with the Anchorage Daily News, saying:

Palin, Oct. 2006: I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum.

After her election, Palin let the matter drop. The Associated Press reported Sept 3: "Palin's children attend public schools and Palin has made no push to have creationism taught in them. ... It reflects a hands-off attitude toward mixing government and religion by most Alaskans." The article was headlined, "Palin has not pushed creation science as governor." It was written by Dan Joling, who reports from Anchorage and has covered Alaska for 30 years.

I think that the stance that Sarah Palin takes on the nefarious doctrine of Darwinism may be too gentle, but we have to keep in mind that she is in the field of politics, and if she took a hardline stance on the Truth, she'd have to contend with money raised for Iraq Hussein Osama by the teachers' unions and the scientists' unions. The passionate creationist may think that it would be foolish to compromise the Truth, and that she should come out completely against Darwinism. However, a pragmatical and eucuenemical approach to the situation is that Sarah Palin would probably not receive significantly more funds from her main constituencies that push for it (evangelical churches and organizations), and a hardline stance against Darwinism would undoubtely push the teachers' unions to donate even more money to the Democrats. (Personally, I think that privatizing the schools, or at least allowing school choice, would be the best course of action in the long run; in this way, the teachers' unions won't be able to influence the minds of our children. However, this would be even worse news for Sarah Palin.) (It would be unwise to forget the power the teachers' unions hold over our nation. Thanks to a Democrat Congress, not even the Great Reagan could smash them, and they continue to grow to this day.)

However, Sarah Palin's stance on the issue, even if it fails to completely satisfy our thirsts, is still reasonable, especially when compared to the Darwinists that advocate censorship of any other view that even questions the idiotic belief. Those that dare to take a hardline stance against Darwinism are often persecuted, and people that support Creationist thought are often shut out from secular organizations altogether. Darwinism is firmly ingrained in the lifeblood of our high school and college institutions, and to insinuate that we topple it immediately and with haste would likely end to our untimely demise, with another Kitzmiller v Dover throwing us off our guard.

Instead, Sarah Palin's support of mandating that Creationism at least be allowed to be discussed by the children is much more pragmatic. The mind of a child is a terrible thing to brainwash, and any steps that we can take at all to stop this tragedy would be an excellent thing. Ideally, the children who wish to debate Creationism will be given material that supports Creationism, along with the rest of the class; similarly, in order to appease the Darwinist mongrels, we'll have to give out similar sheets.

In order to get this into our schools, I think that we should have a referendum that allows this measure to be placed in to our schools, with the voting occuring by county. This will allow the most children of the United States to be influence by Creationism. In fact, if we use this method, some counties can even dispose of Darwinism entirely.

A President Palin, and possibly a President McCain influenced by a Vice President Palin, would surely allow at least this referendum to be voted on; a President Osama or a President Hidin would do their darndest to stop it. Now that we have a fairly conservative Supreme Court, they may also make no effort to stop it. As for the legislative, I don't think the Democrats should be permitted, by the law, to attempt to undermine it; after all, they are the ones that believe that the judicial branch should pass the law, and that the legislative branch should not interfere with it (as several of them have expressed over California's Proposition 8, which would rightfully ban gay marriage, and Proposition 4, which would at least require parents to be notified before their disgraceful daughters receive an abortion). If they tried to undermine it via the legislature, I think that a President Palin would call them out.

Under no circumstances would a President Palin mean that the grassroots can stop working to take over school boards, however. What President Palin would do is protect the rights of the grassroots to do what they want to do; a Commie Fascist Obama would work to silence these Americans. The Christian Coalition succeeded because of a combination of grassroots effort and the Republican Party leadership's apathy; the grassroots will be the ones to establish Creationism in our schools, with President Palin fending off the Darwinist hoards that try to steal our children's minds for their loot.

May Creationism reign supreme one day, and may Darwinism be cast into the dustbin of history!

Isaiah 5:20
Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!

Update: THIS is abominable. Those poor children!

Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!

Reasons For Abortion In Today's Society...It Just Might Surprise You

• Woman is concerned about how having a baby could change her life. 76
• Woman can't afford baby now. 68
• Woman has problems with relationship or wants to avoid single parenthood 51
• Woman is unready for responsibility. 31
• Woman doesn't want others to know she has had sex or is pregnant 31
• Woman is not mature enough, or is too young to have a child 30
• Woman has all the children she wanted, or has all grown-up children 26
• Husband or partner wants woman to have abortion 23
• Baby has possible health problem 13
• Woman has health problem 7
• Woman's parents want her to have abortion 7
• Woman was victim of rape or incest 1
• Other 6

The above, a survey from the Alan Guttmacher Institute a very pro-abortion organization, gives you an idea of what the vast majority of women have abortions for. The first eight, all fall into the category of birth control for convenience, and it is clearly seen that the overwhelming majority of those abortions were not related to the health of the baby or the woman. Moreover, of those who were concerned about the possible health problems, only 8 percent told them that the baby had a health defect or was abnormal. The rest were worried because they had taken drugs or alcohol before they had realized that they were pregnant, but did not seek a medical confirmation from a physician about any health problem with the baby. Of the 53% who were worried about their health, they said a doctor had told them that their condition would be worsened by being pregnant. Of course, naturally, because a man in the business of whole-sale slaughter is going to do everything they can to persuade a woman to murder her baby regardless that the baby is healthy and of the fact that they're committing murder.

We certainly have a disconnect in our society that would make us want to persuade women to murder in the face of an All-Seeing, All-Knowing, All-Powerful, All-Present Living Creator--The God of All Creation.

What are your opinions on the thirteen reasons for abortion...

--Jeremiah--

The Paddle

For those schools who don't have it, or practice it, we need to bring it back. Of course, this would probably bring out the pacifists touting their claims that paddling is abusive and cruel, and other such rhetoric.
The ACLU comes to mind, when such an agenda comes up. Some have said they would "backhand" a teacher if they were to paddle their child. Sounds like the ACLU to me. The ACLU has been a boil on our knecks for a long time, and quite frankly, they're not about Civil rights, but about encouraging the freedom to do more bad behavior. Which is more than good reason to note the current irresponsibility, and children being led into lifestyles by their also delinquent peers.

This is a perfect reason for why we need the paddles back in this country. So many households experience violent protests by trying to appeal to their parents to get them every little wish and whim they want. Thus, you have little or no discipline. Then you have parents who scream about litigating their responsiblities that they should be doing, and thus, when their spoiled little brats get out of control, and the school tries to do something about it, very little measures are taken out to be teaching the children how to be nice and kind to others. Far too many parents reject that which will bring their families together, by taking their children to church and teaching them in the love and gentle admonition of the Lord.

Kids these days, think they can quite simply get away with basically anything at school, including bullying, and threatening teachers, administrators, and other students, why? Because there are no real repercussions to their actions, and are being emboldened by the attitudes that are influencing their behavior at home. To say that some of these youth are brazen is to put it lightly. There is no fear, disrespect is rampant and the school personnel are essentially hopeless in this type of situtation, and they try to deliver effective measures to correct the children. This doesn't even account for the disruption to those students who want to try and learn.

Detention, parental notes, and suspensions don't work. The threat of the paddle would serve as a great deterrent.

For those of you who don't like the idea of corporal punishment, that's fine. Home school your kids, or put them in a private institution, because it shouldn't be the job of taxpayers to have to straighten your kids out!

~ Jeremiah

Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!

VIDEO GAMES ARE HARMFUL TO CHILDREN!

Horrifying is the only word for it! Colorado - 7-year old girl is murdered. Two teenage girls baby-sitting the 7-year old little girl, REPEATEDLY kicked, beat, and bodily slammed the little girl by imitating, get that? By imitating "Mortal Kombat" a video game. Until, finally police came and took the two Demon-possessed teenage girls into custody, and could spend the next 48 years in prison; which is clearly not long enough, these two girls should spend the rest of their teenage and adult lives in prison.

A few facts on video games, and the influence they have on the youth...

Exposure to violent games increases aggressive actions.
Studies measuring aggressive behaviors after playing violent video games (compared with behaviors displayed after playing non-violent games) have shown that violent games increase aggression. In one study of college students, students played either a violent or non-violent game. After playing this game, they were given a competitive reaction time task in which they played against another student. If they beat the other student, they got to deliver a loud "noise blast," and were able to control how loud and how long the noise blast would be. Students who had previously played the violent video game delivered longer noise blasts to their opponents (Anderson & Dill, 2000).

There is indeed a large amount of risk that plays into the puchase of video games, because the consequences far outweigh the benefits. I can understand parents that want something to keep their children occupied, and in a safe place while dads are at work, and mommies are trying to get some house-work done ... Those are largely the benefits ... But on the downside, do the parents ever think about what they are doing when they put their children in front of a TV screen and a game that doesn't just require passive observation, but active participation in the acts of violence and vulgarity being the perpetrator and the victim they are acting against.

As any child psychologist will tell you...most children are looking for a role model, someone to look up to, because when you're young, you don't have a lot of experience in the whole scheme of life's journey, and what life is truly all about, and so what we get in the video games, is an extremely poor role-model, because the video games are teaching the children to be hateful, hurtful, and mostly violent.

Bottom line: Parents should not be buying these games for their children, unless they are prepared to spend the time and energy to guide their children and explain to them the Evilness of the games.

The Video Producers don't care, folks, they're just out to grub some more of the Almighty $$$Buck$$$$$. You can see the cash floating around in the eyes. So yeah, the video producers care less about what they are teaching the children. They every-one need boycotted and thrown out of business.

Most importantly, the parents need to be teaching their children about the Word of God instead of these Satanic video games.

WAKE UP, AMERICA!

~ Jeremiah