Showing posts with label Indoctrination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Indoctrination. Show all posts

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Why Our Country Is In Such A Mess



Indoctrination


It's dangerous!


This is really no surprise, it is what has been going on in our country ever since they took out school prayer and Bible reading in the early '60s, and atheism has taken center stage for 46 years. So, third and fourth generation children are now grown adults, who are parents that take no heed to the communistic propaganda that is being force-fed their children and grandchildren in our public schools today.

Atheism teaches to praise man ... so they teach children to glorify Darwin and his theories, and now they teach them to glorify Obama instead of Almighty God.

Danger, my friends, danger!!!

Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Who Is All Sovereign?

We are at a time now in our nation where the government is taking increasingly more control over the lives of Americans, economically for the most part, but also socially.

The banks, car companies, the health care system, the institution of public education. Virtually everything is controlled to one degree or another by the government.

The question is - how much authority does the federal government have?

Well, considering that America's public educational system has been controlled by liberals, of course, "liberalism" is just a cloak for the underlying philosophy/philosophies that were slipped underneath it (socialism and soon to be communism), in order to give socialism and communism appeal, but hardly have people had a choice in either appealing to or rejecting socialism and communism; as they have been forced to learn and accept the Statist forms of philosophy that are socialism and communism in our schools, and this for more than 50 years, and within that time span literally millions of kids have went through the public school system learning things that are opposed to the free-market system and Capitalistic society, they have been fed atheism and the philosophical underpinnings of Darwinism, Marxism and every form of humanism that leads to the decay, and eventual ruin of any society. The underlying theme of these philosophies is to redefine what we term the "general Welfare" to mean wealth redistribution. In this way, the federal tax on peoples personal incomes becomes steeply graduated over time as a means to create 'despotic inroads on the rights of property.' The reason for this is quite easy to understand, because, taxation, when it is in the hands of fallen creatures it is used as a device where political order where the state is the god of its citizens. Of course, we would not be having this problem had the sixteenth amendment not been ratified, as it nullified the tax limiting effects of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. The sixteenth amendment thus, gives unlimited taxing power to the federal government.

There are positive aspects to taxation, but never when the government becomes the god of the people. As one of our Founding Father's said long ago...

The power to tax involves the power to destroy; [and] the power to destroy may defeat and render useless the power to create; there is a plain repugnance in conferring on one government a power to control the constitutional measures of another...


So, the point here being, the state cannot save no matter how much it taxes in order to fulfill its dream of a Utopian Paradise on earth.

The state has failed to heed the Bible's warnings: Psalm 127:1 (ESV) - "Unless the LORD builds the house, those who build it labor in vain"

There are numerous questions that need to be answered in order to solve the crisis that America now faces, such as: How did our government become so big that it now controls many banks, car companies, and the health industry? What is the government spending the money on that they are taxing the people for?

Both questions correlate to come up with precisely the same answer, and it starts with our young people in our high schools, colleges and major universities. These are either state or federally financed educational institutions, not only that, but they are controlled by left-wing individuals in the NEA (National Education Association) which define the terms on which the curriculum provided to the students is based.

Take now, your hard-earned money, and in turn the government raises your taxes in order to support programs that benefit the philosophies that are taught in our schools that weaken the family unit through such teachings as diversity training (encourages acceptance of homosexuality), sex education at earlier and earlier ages and grade levels (which encourages children to question their parents values, which for many are Christian parents/homes) and thus, you get children who think they have a license to commit fornication and that are not ready or prepared mentally and financially to raise children, but ... this is what the federal government wants you see. Through the arbitrary actions of despotic judges ruling from the bench, they have legalized the murder of unborn children, and this in turn, strengthens and supports Planned Parenthood's big business of death to the unborn, then there is Darwinism in science class, which teaches children that they came from apes and encourages them to believe that they "don't" have a Creator.

I was reading in some of the writings by Jonathan Wells, Ph.D., in his book, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design, and he has done some tremendous research into the matter; he wrote that Ernst Haeckel, one of the earliest and most prominent eugenicists, and whom was a backer and proponent of Darwinism justified abortion on the grounds that babies before birth are lower forms of animals - in other words, to define them of less worth than persons outside the womb. Also, Darwin regarded white Europeans as more highly evolved than other races.

If you study the history of Planned Parenthood, the founder of which is Margaret Sanger, you will find that her agenda was based on the very same beliefs as those of Charles Darwin, one quote of hers that sticks in my mind is this one - "We don't want the word to get out that we want to exterminate the black race." - Margaret Sanger. Very similar to that, anyhow.

Of course, nowadays, it (abortion) is being used as not targeting a particular race of people, but people on a broad spectrum worldwide, all on a superstition that more people is "bad for the planet," linking their alarmist agenda to try and give abortion a "positive" tone. I guess one could say, if Darwin had not come along, we maybe could have avoided the Jewish Holocaust, and the greatest, the most horrid Holocaust of all, the Abortion Holocaust. Since 1973, there has been over 50 Million unborn children murdered in their mothers wombs, and with each year that passes over Million more precious lives are added to that number, and if Obama has his way, which, he most likely will, that number will increase to nearly double if not triple the Million number in the event that he passes the most pro-abortion bill ever introduced to Congress, the "Freedom of Choice Act."

When you factor in taxes, a percentage of your income is figured in your federal income taxes to help support the Nazi organization Planned Parenthood, with various other private bureaucracies that contribute to the organization, some, of which is disguised under Medicaid, yet ... the organization is tax-exempt, and therefore, do not have to give an account for their earnings. So, what money they do earn from out-of-pocket volunteers, the government and private bureaucracies they use to continue the support for their industry through publication of brochures, textbook curriculum, videos and various other programs to persuade young people into dangerous lifestyles, fornication, promiscuity, and murdering their unborn children.

A good book that I recommend reading on this subject is George Grant's book titled "Grand Illusions", it is a history of Planned Parenthood.

Margaret Sanger; Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and others are all prime examples of those who were determined to believe that they were "all-sovereign". Indeed, the injustices they committed and were committed to, were a clear indication of a man-made-god mentality, and the result being millions of innocent people being slaughtered over a desire for raw, brute power.

In recent news, I read an article written by Michelle Malkin in which she cited the New York Times warning about what they call a "whacky scientist" who had turned Christian, Dr. Francis Collins and the New York Times was worried about his "public embrace of religion" but the trouble was, they let the real whack-job off the hook, one who embraces his own views, and some very disturbing ones at that. John Holdren, Obama's director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and co-chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, co-authored the innocuously titled "Ecoscience" in the 1970s with population control extremists Paul and Anne Ehrlich.

Holdren is one who believes in compulsory, or coerced (forced) abortions. What you can glean from his views, is that he is one whom this thread defines. He is another Darwinist who rejects the greater, overarching Authority.

I think you can get a basic idea of what I'm trying to point out here, but I'll try to simplify it a bit.

When one like those I've mentioned Darwin, Hitler, Margaret Sanger, Stalin, and John Holdren reject authority from above, and being fallen creatures at the same time injustices, or abuse of authority and is the case most of the time, will occur. They will take taxation to the extreme, they will advocate for the departure from, and rejection of traditional values, marriage, gender roles, they will advocate for, and try to justify injustices such as the murder of unborn children by deeming them of "less" worth than human beings who have been given the gift of life. They will advocate for euthanasia. The will encourage the passage of bills that will legalize life-destroying substances, such as John Holdren who wanted to poison all public water systems in order to make women infertile and unable to bear children.

This is why it is very important that we work to get education out of the hands of those who reject an overarching authority, and think that they are "sovereign" on the issues of life, values, and so forth.

Only God is sovereign,friends, and He has delegated to man only so much authority, which means the government is limited as to certain actions that they can take. If the government rejects God's All-Sovereignty, then we must reject the government's judgment.

I will explain in future posts what the government's purpose and duty under God is.

God bless you!

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Indoctrination: Good or Bad?

I'm going to talk a little bit about what the differences are regarding indoctrination, as it deals with education, in particular, sex education - which, I, for one, do not find acceptable, but since liberalism has infiltrated our system of public education, and has created an epidemic of problems; most notably moral decay, I feel it is something that must be discussed, that we might reach a solution to ending the wrong type ... if you will, indoctrination.

It would greatly depend on what kind of indoctrination is in practice.

Indoctrinate means to: instruct in fundamentals; to teach the principles or doctrines of a particular group.

So, the definition of indoctrinate in and of itself is not bad as it doesn’t say which group, or which doctrine.

The question, should be, then, what group do you wish the indoctrination to come from?

Do you want to teach homosexuality (two men; two women)? Or, do you want to teach heterosexuality (man and wife)?

Do you want to teach abstinence; fidelity (withholding intercourse for marriage)? Or, do you want to teach fornication and promiscuity (sex before marriage)?

In those examples, they’re where you get into the right and wrong aspects of indoctrination. Indoctrinate contains the principle word - doctrine. In - denoting a conveyance of the term as to instructing a particular doctrine.

We have the doctrine of homosexuality which teaches children sexuality backwards - In other words, the intent of the instructor is to confuse a child about his or her sexuality, with no thought given to the dangers of instructing them in that manner; and too, it sadly destroys many bright young minds.

The homosexual lifestyle, is recognized as positive tell-tale sign of disbelief in their Creator, professing to be wise, they became fools, and therefore, Romans 1:24 says - ‘God gave them up (to a reprobate mind) to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies among themselves.’
And for this reason, is the reason that I would prefer to teach children abstinence until marriage between One man and One woman.

The better approach would be to not teach anything regarding sexuality at all to children, however, we have to come to the point now where we have generations upon generations of people who’ve been indoctrinated into the mindset of radical autonomy; meaning sexual deviance of every kind–Much of it can be attributed to the agenda of Margaret Sanger who is in a not so pleasant place, at the present moment, whose legacy has brought to us the devastation of 50,000,000 plus fatally and with malice aforethought; children murdered in their celibate and fornicating mothers wombs. But many of which were harassed and coerced by their parents or partner into aborting the child.

The formative solution to this dilemma, then, would be to return to teaching the foundation of this country to America’s youth, God’s Word - that America might turn from her wicked, dastardly ways, and once again, be counted worthy in the sight of Almighty God.

Feel free to share your thoughts and opinions...

Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Hitler Jugend and Obama Jugend

History, which I am pretty much illiterate on, as I am on most subects. My education went in one ear and out the other...I just didn't have the patience to sit and study, combined with my very timid nature in social settings; making it very difficult for me to learn, but I made it to gain a high school diploma. It is a miracle that I am sitting her typing this today.

Anyhow, I wonder how many world history books in today's era of education inform students about Hitler's despotic history of indoctrinating youth? I've been doing some research and I came across this interesting piece of information - Hitler Youth, or HitlerJugend for German speak. Hitler Youth was a form of education implemented by Hitler himself, training young children to become Nazis...in many instances, it was "education" more in the line of indoctrination, training children to hate those that Hitler hated, which, for the most part, were the Jews.

I also wonder how many people in America today understand that President-elect Obama's policy of education is similar in nature? While it may not be exactly the same as Hitler's education policy, I firmly believe that we, as America, are headed a step closer to the same thing of that day, in Obama's policy of education. It's not that difficult to fully understand the reality of this when you take a look at Obama's intentions. For instance, he is opposed to school vouchers, which means he is opposed to school choice, and if he is opposed to school vouchers, then I suspect he is against private schools and homeschooling - He wants the public school system to reign supreme, which is used as a strong-arm for the Atheist/Communists to indoctrinate and coerce children to accept the atheist agenda, which the students will later use to harbor hatred in their hearts for Christians.

While this may not seem to be a big problem - be warned, it is a very large problem, as more children attend public education than do private and home-schoolers. How does it become such a big problem? Well, if you decipher it, with there being a larger percentage of children attending public education, this translates into a larger number of people favoring the destructive forces of atheism when they go vote, and this election was a prime example as those who are freedom-loving individuals lost this election, not to mention all true Christians lost this election. Whereas, this election would have turned out differently if Christians would have defended education against the ACLU.

So, the future of America depends on how much effort the Christian people put into stopping the Communist indoctrination in our public system of "education".

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Sarah Palin: A Step Towards True Science

Upon browsing the media for a little bit, I apparently receive this bit of information on what Sarah Palin thinks of the teaching of creationism (or intelligent design, if you have to subscribe to politically correct gobbledygook):


On Aug. 29, the Boston Globe reported that Palin was open to teaching creationism in public schools. That's true. She supports teaching creationism alongside evolution, though she has not actively pursued such a policy as governor.

In an Oct. 25, 2006, debate, when asked about teaching alternatives to evolution, Palin replied:

Palin, Oct. 25, 2006: Teach both. You know, don't be afraid of information. Healthy debate is so important and it's so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both. And you know, I say this too as the daughter of a science teacher. Growing up with being so privileged and blessed to be given a lot of information on, on both sides of the subject – creationism and evolution. It's been a healthy foundation for me. But don't be afraid of information and let kids debate both sides.
A couple of days later, Palin amended that statement in an interview with the Anchorage Daily News, saying:
Palin, Oct. 2006: I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum.
After her election, Palin let the matter drop. The Associated Press reported Sept 3: "Palin's children attend public schools and Palin has made no push to have creationism taught in them. ... It reflects a hands-off attitude toward mixing government and religion by most Alaskans." The article was headlined, "Palin has not pushed creation science as governor." It was written by Dan Joling, who reports from Anchorage and has covered Alaska for 30 years.


I think that the stance that Sarah Palin takes on the nefarious doctrine of Darwinism may be too gentle, but we have to keep in mind that she is in the field of politics, and if she took a hardline stance on the Truth, she'd have to contend with money raised for Iraq Hussein Osama by the teachers' unions and the scientists' unions. The passionate creationist may think that it would be foolish to compromise the Truth, and that she should come out completely against Darwinism. However, a pragmatical and eucuenemical approach to the situation is that Sarah Palin would probably not receive significantly more funds from her main constituencies that push for it (evangelical churches and organizations), and a hardline stance against Darwinism would undoubtely push the teachers' unions to donate even more money to the Democrats. (Personally, I think that privatizing the schools, or at least allowing school choice, would be the best course of action in the long run; in this way, the teachers' unions won't be able to influence the minds of our children. However, this would be even worse news for Sarah Palin.) (It would be unwise to forget the power the teachers' unions hold over our nation. Thanks to a Democrat Congress, not even the Great Reagan could smash them, and they continue to grow to this day.)

However, Sarah Palin's stance on the issue, even if it fails to completely satisfy our thirsts, is still reasonable, especially when compared to the Darwinists that advocate censorship of any other view that even questions the idiotic belief. Those that dare to take a hardline stance against Darwinism are often persecuted, and people that support Creationist thought are often shut out from secular organizations altogether. Darwinism is firmly ingrained in the lifeblood of our high school and college institutions, and to insinuate that we topple it immediately and with haste would likely end to our untimely demise, with another Kitzmiller v Dover throwing us off our guard.

Instead, Sarah Palin's support of mandating that Creationism at least be allowed to be discussed by the children is much more pragmatic. The mind of a child is a terrible thing to brainwash, and any steps that we can take at all to stop this tragedy would be an excellent thing. Ideally, the children who wish to debate Creationism will be given material that supports Creationism, along with the rest of the class; similarly, in order to appease the Darwinist mongrels, we'll have to give out similar sheets.

In order to get this into our schools, I think that we should have a referendum that allows this measure to be placed in to our schools, with the voting occuring by county. This will allow the most children of the United States to be influence by Creationism. In fact, if we use this method, some counties can even dispose of Darwinism entirely.

A President Palin, and possibly a President McCain influenced by a Vice President Palin, would surely allow at least this referendum to be voted on; a President Osama or a President Hidin would do their darndest to stop it. Now that we have a fairly conservative Supreme Court, they may also make no effort to stop it. As for the legislative, I don't think the Democrats should be permitted, by the law, to attempt to undermine it; after all, they are the ones that believe that the judicial branch should pass the law, and that the legislative branch should not interfere with it (as several of them have expressed over California's Proposition 8, which would rightfully ban gay marriage, and Proposition 4, which would at least require parents to be notified before their disgraceful daughters receive an abortion). If they tried to undermine it via the legislature, I think that a President Palin would call them out.

Under no circumstances would a President Palin mean that the grassroots can stop working to take over school boards, however. What President Palin would do is protect the rights of the grassroots to do what they want to do; a Commie Fascist Obama would work to silence these Americans. The Christian Coalition succeeded because of a combination of grassroots effort and the Republican Party leadership's apathy; the grassroots will be the ones to establish Creationism in our schools, with President Palin fending off the Darwinist hoards that try to steal our children's minds for their loot.

May Creationism reign supreme one day, and may Darwinism be cast into the dustbin of history!

Isaiah 5:20
Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!


Update: THIS is abominable. Those poor children!

Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!

Saturday, October 4, 2008

Frightening Reminder



A frightening, yes, very, very frightening re-visit to how the Nazi regime worked during Hitler's reign, indoctrinated children to change the culture into one that is trained to impose extreme hatred upon the Jewish community, of which Hitler performed genocide upon murdering more than 11 million.

We find the same tactic here with these little children in California being shaped into ones that will later be firm believers in the atheism that today's teachers and professors are indoctrinating children with in grade school all the way to college and major university students who are trained in the dangerous ideologies of Darwinism, which teaches that "evolution" is making mankind "better". Nothing could be farther from the truth, friends, because the Bible tells us that mankind was created perfect in the beginning, and that because of sin (man's disobedience) that mankind will continue to deteriorate because of sin ... there is hope though, in the fact that we know this life is not all there is, and that God sent His Only Son to die for our sins on the Cross at Calvary so that we might be accept His forgiveness, and that we may reside with Him in heaven, which is everlasting hope...which should be every persons objective.

Atheism rejects this hope, because atheism seeks no goals, only the self or me, as it were, to in essence, live an empty life controlled by the devil. These same children will one day be grown individuals who will hate Christian people, just as the Nazi propaganda taught the children of Germany to hate Jews.

All the more reason we need to encourage others to get our there to the voting booths next month coming together to support John McCain and Sarah Palin for our Presidency.

Please do this for the sake of America's future.

God bless!



Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!