Saturday, March 1, 2008

Farrakhan On Obama

Not much difference is there?

Obama's latest endorsement coming from a crazed-bigot, and hater of the Jews.

What can we gather from such an endorsement?

Well, for one, he is the acting head of the Nation of Islam for Elijah Muhammed here in the U.S., and also his interests include give power to the African American movement. He is best known for his anti-semitic remarks against America.

Such as - "White people, are "potential" people-they haven't evolved yet." He praised Hitler in a speech, in which he said - "Hitler was a great man." Which alludes to the fact that Farrakhan would like no better than to see Israel wiped off the map. Terrorist appeaser #1. In my honest humble opinion.

In Farrakhan's endorsement the other day, here's what he said - "If you look at Barack Obama's [diverse] audiences and look at the effect of his words, those people are being transformed from what they were," Farrakhan said. "This young man is the hope of the entire world that America will change and be a better place."

Just before the actual endorsement, here's what Mr. Farrakhan said - "We are witnessing the phenomenal rise of a man of color in a country that has persecuted us because of our color," he said.

Hmmm, interesting, to say the least...I wonder where Mr. Farrakhan would be today if it had not been for all the brave Christian men and women who fought to make this country free, in the bloodiest battle in American history...?

If anything, Lewis, there's one thing for sure, YOU didn't pay the price, it was the Godly Christian White men and women that fought to make America free.

Obama opines - I have been very clear in my denunciation” of Farrakhan’s history of anti-Semitic remarks, Obama said at the Democratic debate in Cleveland, “I did not solicit his support.” Obama said he “can not censor” individual endorsements but said there is no affiliation with his campaign and Farrakhan. “I can’t say to somebody that he can’t say that he thinks I’m a good guy,” Obama said, citing his support among Jewish Americans and stating that he would make it a priority to soothe historically tense ties between the African-American and Jewish communities in the nation. “I have some of the strongest support from the Jewish community in my hometown of Chicago and in this campaign,” he said, describing himself as a “stalwart” on supporting Israel.

"Stalwart"? Yeah, riiiight.

If Farrakhan's endorsement is any indication at all, then it means that America must awake now to the dangers that lie ahead. Obama may "denounce" Farrakhan's support, But I'm not buyin' it!!! Within a year's span, following Obama's oath of office, I would not be surprised if this country comes under the gun of radical Islamic terrorism. The whole of the Islamic community supports him, so there's no need in Obama trying to play into the hands of voters with this "audacity of hope" rhetoric, the picture is clear as the blue sky. It was Obama's suggestion that he was the "Only one against the Iraq war from the starting point." He cannot look straight into the eyes of the American and then call himself a "stalwart" in "support" of Israel. Thousands possibly millions of Jews were slaughtered at the hands of the Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, and Taliban.

To better interpret what Obama is trying to say, here is the translation of what he said last sunday - 'I, Barack Obama, am a stalwart for my own personal agenda, America will succeed no better than what my agenda allows it to.'

Hopefully, Americans won't be hypnotized and fall into this empty-vessel of "hope," that has already blinded millions.

Your thoughts...


Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!


  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

  2. anonymous,

    Based on your supposition that because no one is commenting that that somehow means no one is united in the Conservative movement. While you are intent upon voicing your vile mind, and disdain for people of Faith.

    Many have read my blog, not many have commented, but that does not mean anything at all, If someone comments they are usually Liberals who disagree through their hatred with what is said ... and that's fine, but I will not put up with hatred and filthy language on my blog.

    I'm looking for discussion with Christian Conservatives.

    So your tripe is meaningless and worthless to me. I could care less what you think of what I write.

    Thank You.


  3. You realize that Obama rejected Farrakhan's endorsement,right?

    Unlike McCaine did with the insanity of Hagee.

  4. anonymous,

    Thing is, Farrakhan's a known commie, hater of America, plus the Jews.

    Hagee's a minister of the Gospel reaching out to the lost. Not to mention endorsing a good man to boot.


  5. Hagee is also an end-times nutcase who openly and freely states a desire to bring about armageddon. That's rediculous. Obama did the right thing by denying Farrakhan. Sad that McCain didn't.

  6. Well, it's your choice ... but I'm not buyin' that Obama rejects his Farrakhan's support ... he's in it for one reason and one reason only, for the black power. With a lot of Muslim indoctrination to go with it.

    John Hagee doesn't believe in beheading people!!


  7. Jeremiah, what is it that God hates the most?

    The answer would be a hypocrite.

  8. The answer would be a hypocrite.

    Yep. Can't disagree with that. So, why then, if Obama is supposedly a "Christian" would he stand for a supposed right, or choice to murder unborn children? What a horrible tragic thing that has happened to this nation, millions snuffed out for no other reason that for selfish-reasons.

    There's no heart in that, what's wrong with people that they would teach something so abhorrently sick?? None other than Satan.

    Why then, does he stand for polygamy and two people of the same-sex getting married?

    What does the current definition of marriage say?

    The institution whereby a man and woman are joined in a special social and legal reltaionship for the purpose of making a home and raising a family.

    Buddy, I hate to tell you this, but liberalism is evil, anyone who would stand for the type of immorality that liberalism teaches is going to bring judgment upon this nation in terrible way. It is the main problem with our society today, and people need to turn back before it's too late.


  9. I'm not that anonymous,but I'll answer.Because Christ taught forgiveness and love,not intolerence and hate. A nation of laws sir, not a nation of religious zealots.

  10. A nation of laws sir, not a nation of religious zealots.

    So the law was made to justify murder?

    Or maybe it's the other way around, the law was made to save life...


  11. ....Or, did Jesus come to die so that people could go on murdering their babies, and indulging in deviant lifestyles?

    I think Jesus wants us to think, so that we will know that when temptation comes we're not supposed to give in, and sin. His entering the world condemned sin, because He is the light, His love and forgiveness are what gives us the ability to know right from wrong. Not to be "tolerant" of sin.


  12. Define the murder you claim to be happening,and point to the law that says it is murder. Or are you back on the abortion kick? Why do you guys worry so much about cells when there are lives that have a conscience dying daily? Is it too much trouble to actually focus on the living?

  13. Define the murder you claim to be happening,and point to the law that says it is murder.

    They signed murder into law in 1973. Since then, 50,000,000 little innocents have been murdered.

    Murder is the intentional unlawful killing of a person.

    So why do the ACLU, Courts and Liberals not think so?


  14. What persons were killed as defined by law? Opinions vary. The accepted opinion is that it is not a "person" until a certain time. Your opinion may be different. It does not make it any more valid.