Some contention is being made by Democrats like Nancy Pelosi that in all past Congressional deliberations on "healthcare" reform they have been open with the public about their intentions. Have they? No, not true. Most or all of their meetings have been behind closed-doors. This will probably come as a shock to many, as many thought that they could trust Mr. Obama when he promised a "new age of transparency" in our government.
Make no mistake, friends, Obama has no intentions whatsoever to be transparent with anybody about his fascist like intentions. It's how they foist their fascism on the populace, the God-fearing, hard-working, taxpaying, patriotic citizenry. It's the road to a classless society that Karl Marx so adamantly advocated for, with freedom being only at the top, in Washington D.C.
Democrats say they are preparing to finish their "healthcare" reform bill, but not before bypassing conference committee, which is used to work out differences in forthcoming bills with such issues as abortion, tax proposals, and earmarks. Instead, liberals want to remain in control of these issues, as they feel they can't afford to allow healthy unborn babies to live. Sick, isn't it?
Well, they still can't go forward without the sixty votes necessary to cross Obama's desk, and it doesn't appear as if that's going to happen, as many on the Democrats side are jumping ship.
Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!
Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Friday, August 21, 2009
"We're Going To RAM It Through"
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Senate democrats have a new plan on how they can pass a health care restructuring bill that will result in abortion funding and coverage. Meanwhile, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says they will approve the legislation "by any legislative means necessary."
Apparently unable to get enough votes to approve the government-run health care plan on its own, Senate Democrats say they will split up the legislation into two parts.
The first, less controversial portion consisting of policy changes in the insurance market, would be an effort to get moderate Democrats and Republicans to support the measure.
Please Read The Full Story... Credits to LifeNews.Com
By "whatever legislative means necessary" ... Well, that explains it. The Democrats don't care one way or the other how the American people feel about the "healthcare" bill ... it's kill the unborn babies whether the American people like it or not ... it's a huge taxpayer expenditure whether the American people like it or not, and they will pay it ... it's ration out health care and let Grandma and Grandpa die ... in other words "kill them."
It's time to wake up, America!!
Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Proof Obama Osama Supporters Are Shallow
This is your typical moonbat community:
Somebody needs to do something about these liberal moonbats. Predictably, the search for how much the MSM is covering this receives scant results. If you still aren't convinced that the media is liberal, then perhaps I could interest you with some land in Atlantis that I'm selling.
I think it's high time that Americans started outright revolting against the Leftists that are repressing the conservative movement. They indoctrinate our children with a variety of tactics, such as the evil idea that sharing is a necessity in kindergarten, to the mock elections held in elementary school, to the intimidation of conservatives in middle school. Once in high school, conservatives are kept off the football teams and out of nearly every extracurricular activity conceivable. Once in college, conservatives are routinely hunted down by the radical anarchists and Bolshevists that prowl the staircases until their blood is oozing down the classroom stairs.
If you, as a conservative, are willing to sit idly by as such persecution structures are built, then you are part of the problem, if not an Anti-American yourself. Action must be taken to avenge Catherine Vogt from the bloodthirsty Secularists and poor people that comprise the Oak Park community. If you note that your school has far too much liberalism in it, take action. Petition the local, state, and federal governments to cut that school's funding, and then dismantle it. Call upon the American Family Association to sign a petition mandating that this school remain neutral in the culture wars. Start blockading the public school doors with able-bodied conservatives, and turn the little brats away from the education they are siphoning YOUR tax dollars towards. Post pictures of the trillions of people killed by Nazis, Commies, Stalinists, Islamofascists, rappers, video gamers, homosexuals, abortionists, Secularists, liberals, and Democrats.
As for the children, remind them that Democrats want to make sure that the resident idiot making Fs and bullying the rest of the children has the same amount of recess time as the other kids. Remind them that their parents probably don't know anything about politics, and should shut up for the rest of the nation's sake. Point out to them that teachers overwhelmingly endorse Democrats, and how their teachers are probably jackbooted goosesteppers that hate them. Teach them that Darwinism is responsible for the majority of school shootings, bullying, and suicides. Remind them that liberals are continually fighting to make sure that they can only eat vegetables in school cafeterias, and want to take away their desserts.
Then see the results. Liberalism and its cockroach manifestation will be drowning in the bath tub, begging to grab the rubber ducky that could serve as its inflatable, while the rubber ducky reminds them that the great vacuum of history is not so tolerant to the intolerant. Witness the rubber ducky swim away from the evil cockroach, and remain uncontaminated for the sake of your children.
Do you really want your children to be beaten up by liberals that want to make the rest of them miserable? Could you, as a concerned parent, outraged student, or rebellious teacher, tolerate the amount of liberalism in our schools?
As the media keeps gushing on about how America has finally adopted tolerance as the great virtue, and that we're all united now, let's consider the Brave Catherine Vogt Experiment.
Catherine Vogt, 14, is an Illinois 8th grader, the daughter of a liberal mom and a conservative dad. She wanted to conduct an experiment in political tolerance and diversity of opinion at her school in the liberal suburb of Oak Park.
She noticed that fellow students at Gwendolyn Brooks Middle School overwhelmingly supported Barack Obama for president. His campaign kept preaching "inclusion," and she decided to see how included she could be.
So just before the election, Catherine consulted with her history teacher, then bravely wore a unique T-shirt to school and recorded the comments of teachers and students in her journal. The T-shirt bore the simple yet quite subversive words drawn with a red marker:
"McCain Girl."
"I was just really curious how they'd react to something that different, because a lot of people at my school wore Obama shirts and they are big Obama supporters," Catherine told us. "I just really wanted to see what their reaction would be."
Immediately, Catherine learned she was stupid for wearing a shirt with Republican John McCain's name. Not merely stupid. Very stupid.
"People were upset. But they started saying things, calling me very stupid, telling me my shirt was stupid and I shouldn't be wearing it," Catherine said.
Then it got worse.
"One person told me to go die. It was a lot of dying. A lot of comments about how I should be killed," Catherine said, of the tolerance in Oak Park.
But students weren't the only ones surprised that she wore a shirt supporting McCain.
"In one class, I had one teacher say she will not judge me for my choice, but that she was surprised that I supported McCain," Catherine said.
If Catherine was shocked by such passive-aggressive threats from instructors, just wait until she goes to college.
"Later, that teacher found out about the experiment and said she was embarrassed because she knew I was writing down what she said," Catherine said.
One student suggested that she be put up on a cross for her political beliefs.
"He said, 'You should be crucifixed.' It was kind of funny because, I was like, don't you mean 'crucified?' " Catherine said.
Other entries in her notebook involved suggestions by classmates that she be "burned with her shirt on" for "being a filthy-rich Republican."
Some said that because she supported McCain, by extension she supported a plan by deranged skinheads to kill Obama before the election. And I thought such politicized logic was confined to American newsrooms. Yet Catherine refused to argue with her peers. She didn't want to jeopardize her experiment.
"I couldn't show people really what it was for. I really kind of wanted to laugh because they had no idea what I was doing," she said.
Only a few times did anyone say anything remotely positive about her McCain shirt. One girl pulled her aside in a corner, out of earshot of other students, and whispered, "I really like your shirt."
That's when you know America is truly supportive of diversity of opinion, when children must whisper for fear of being ostracized, heckled and crucifixed.
The next day, in part 2 of The Brave Catherine Vogt Experiment, she wore another T-shirt, this one with "Obama Girl" written in blue. And an amazing thing happened.
Catherine wasn't very stupid anymore. She grew brains.
"People liked my shirt. They said things like my brain had come back, and I had put the right shirt on today," Catherine said.
Some students accused her of playing both sides.
"A lot of people liked it. But some people told me I was a flip-flopper," she said. "They said, 'You can't make up your mind. You can't wear a McCain shirt one day and an Obama shirt the next day.' "
But she sure did, and she turned her journal into a report for her history teacher, earning Catherine extra credit. We asked the teacher, Norma Cassin-Pountney, whether it was ironic that Catherine would be subject to such intolerance from pro-Obama supporters in a community that prides itself on its liberal outlook.
"That's what we discussed," Cassin-Pountney said about the debate in the classroom when the experiment was revealed. "I said, here you are, promoting this person [Obama] that believes we are all equal and included, and look what you've done? The students were kind of like, 'Oh, yeah.' I think they got it."
Catherine never told us which candidate she would have voted for if she weren't an 8th grader. But she said she learned what it was like to be in the minority.
"Just being on the outside, how it felt, it was not fun at all," she said.
Don't ever feel as if you must conform, Catherine. Being on the outside isn't so bad. Trust me.
Somebody needs to do something about these liberal moonbats. Predictably, the search for how much the MSM is covering this receives scant results. If you still aren't convinced that the media is liberal, then perhaps I could interest you with some land in Atlantis that I'm selling.
I think it's high time that Americans started outright revolting against the Leftists that are repressing the conservative movement. They indoctrinate our children with a variety of tactics, such as the evil idea that sharing is a necessity in kindergarten, to the mock elections held in elementary school, to the intimidation of conservatives in middle school. Once in high school, conservatives are kept off the football teams and out of nearly every extracurricular activity conceivable. Once in college, conservatives are routinely hunted down by the radical anarchists and Bolshevists that prowl the staircases until their blood is oozing down the classroom stairs.
If you, as a conservative, are willing to sit idly by as such persecution structures are built, then you are part of the problem, if not an Anti-American yourself. Action must be taken to avenge Catherine Vogt from the bloodthirsty Secularists and poor people that comprise the Oak Park community. If you note that your school has far too much liberalism in it, take action. Petition the local, state, and federal governments to cut that school's funding, and then dismantle it. Call upon the American Family Association to sign a petition mandating that this school remain neutral in the culture wars. Start blockading the public school doors with able-bodied conservatives, and turn the little brats away from the education they are siphoning YOUR tax dollars towards. Post pictures of the trillions of people killed by Nazis, Commies, Stalinists, Islamofascists, rappers, video gamers, homosexuals, abortionists, Secularists, liberals, and Democrats.
As for the children, remind them that Democrats want to make sure that the resident idiot making Fs and bullying the rest of the children has the same amount of recess time as the other kids. Remind them that their parents probably don't know anything about politics, and should shut up for the rest of the nation's sake. Point out to them that teachers overwhelmingly endorse Democrats, and how their teachers are probably jackbooted goosesteppers that hate them. Teach them that Darwinism is responsible for the majority of school shootings, bullying, and suicides. Remind them that liberals are continually fighting to make sure that they can only eat vegetables in school cafeterias, and want to take away their desserts.
Then see the results. Liberalism and its cockroach manifestation will be drowning in the bath tub, begging to grab the rubber ducky that could serve as its inflatable, while the rubber ducky reminds them that the great vacuum of history is not so tolerant to the intolerant. Witness the rubber ducky swim away from the evil cockroach, and remain uncontaminated for the sake of your children.
Do you really want your children to be beaten up by liberals that want to make the rest of them miserable? Could you, as a concerned parent, outraged student, or rebellious teacher, tolerate the amount of liberalism in our schools?
Labels:
Democrats,
Education,
Lunatic Liberals,
Persecution
Monday, January 14, 2008
Comparisons!
Air Force #1 & it's passengers...a must read, folks! YOU WILL FIND THE SECRET SERVICE VIEWS ON THE PERSONALITIES OF PAST PRESIDENTS TO BE QUITE INTERESTING. For those who don't know... Capt. Denny Keast flies for UAL and flew many SAM's (Special Air Mission's) for the White House. ********************************************************
I flew 4 Presidential support missions in the C-141 out of Dover AFB, DE.. Two for President Johnson and two for President Nixon. Johnson was a first class jerk and on the two occasions I flew for him, if the Secret Service and their Liaison in the Pentagon hadn't intervened, we would have had to stay on the airplane for hours while he (Johnson) was off somewhere. Nix on never required that and the four (4) stops we made with him he was cordial to the Secret Service and to me and my crew. We had a neighbor when I lived in DC who was part of the secret service presidential detail for many years. His stories of Kennedy and Johnson were the same as those I heard from the guys who flew the presidents' plane, Yes, Kennedy did have Marilyn Monroe flown in for secret "dates," and LBJ was a typical Texas "good ole boy" womanizer. Nixon, Bush 41, and Carter never cheated on their wives. Clinton cheated, but couldn't match Kennedy or LBJ in style or variety. The information below is accurate: The elder Bush and current president Bush make it a point to thank and take care of the air crews who fly them around. When the president flies, there are several planes that also go, one carries the armored limo, another the security detail, plus usually a press aircraft. Both B ushes made it a point to stay home on holidays, so the Air Force and security people could have a day with their families. Hillary Clinton was arrogant and orally abusive to her security detail. She forbade her daughter, Chelsea, from exchanging pleasantries with them. Sometimes Chelsea, miffed at her mother's obvious conceit and mean spiritedness, ignored her demands and exchanged pleasantries regardless, but never in her mother's presence. Chelsea really was a nice, kindhearted, and lovely young lady. The consensus opinion was that Chelsea loved her Mom but did not like her. Hillary Clinton was continuously rude and abrasive to those who were charged to protect her life. Her security detail dutifully did their job, as professionals should, but they all loathed her and wanted to be on a different detail. Hillary Clinton was despised by the Secret Service as a whole. Former President Bill Clinton was much more amia ble than his wife. Often the Secret Service would cringe at the verbal attacks Hillary would use against her husband. They were embarrassed for his sake by the manner and frequency in which she verbally insulted him, sometimes in the presence of the Secret Service, and sometimes behind closed doors. Even behind closed doors Hillary Clinton would scream and holler so loudly that everyone could hear what she was saying. Many felt sorry for President Clinton and most wondered why he tolerated it instead of just divorcing his "attack dog" wife. It was crystal clear that the Clintons neither liked nor respected each other and this was true long before the Monica Lewinsky scandal. Theirs was genuinely a "marriage of convenience." Chelsea was much closer to her father than her mother, even after the Lewinsky scandal, which hurt her gravely. Bill Clinton did in fact have charisma, and occasionally would smile at or shake hands with his security detail. Still, he always displayed an obvious air of superiority towards them. His security detail uniformly believed him to be disingenuous, false, and that he did nothing without a motive that in some way would enhance his image and political career. He was polite, but not kind. They did not particularly like him and nobody trusted him.
Al Gore was the male version of Hillary Clinton. They were friendlier toward each other than either of them were towards former President Clinton. They were not intimate, so please don't read that in. They were very close in a political way. Tipper Gore was generally nice and pleasant. She initially liked Hillary but soon after the election she had her "pegged" and no longer liked her or associated with her except for events that were politically obligatory. Al Gore was far more left wing than Bill Clinton. Al Gore resented Bill Clinton and thought he was too "centrist." He despised all Republicans. His hatred was bitter and this was long before he announced for the Presidency. This hatred was something that he and Hillary had in common. They often said as much, even in the presence of their security detail. Neither of them trusted Bill Clinton and, the Secret Service opined, neither of them even liked him. Bill Clinton did have some good qualities, whereas Al Gore and Hillary had none, in the view of their security details. Al Gore, like Hillary, was very rude and arrogant toward his security detail. He was extremely unappreciative and would not hesitate to scold them in the presence of their peers for minor details over which they had no control. Al Gore also looked down on them, as they finally observed and learned with certainty on one occasion. Al got angry at his offspring and pointed at his security detail and said, "Do you want to grow up and be like the m?" Word of this insult by the former Vice-President quickly spread and he became as disliked by the Secret Service as Hillary. Most of them prayed Al Gore would not be elected President, and they really did have private celebrations in a few of their homes after President Bush won. This was not necessarily to celebrate President Bush's election, but to celebrate Al Gore's defeat. Everyone in the Secret Service wants to be on First Lady Laura Bush's detail. Without exception, they concede that she is perhaps the nicest and most kind person they have ever had the privilege of serving. Where Hillary patently refused to allow her picture to be taken with her security detail, Laura Bush doesn't even have to be asked, she offers. She doesn't just shake their hand and say, "Thank you." Very often, she will give members of her detail a kindhearted hug to express her appreciation. There is nothing false about her. This is her genuine nature. Her security detail considers her to be a "breath of fresh air." They joke that comparing Laura Bush with Hillary Clinton is like comparing "Mother Teresa" with the "Wicked Witch of the North." Likewise, the Secret Service considers President Bush to be a gem of a man to work for. He always treats them with genuine respect and he always trusts and listens to their expert advice.
They really like the Crawford, Texas detail. Every time the president goes to Crawford he has a Bar-B-Q for his security detail and he helps serve their meals. He sits with them, eats with them, and talks with them.. He knows each of them by their first name, and calls them by their first name as a show of affection. He always asks about their family, the names of which he always remembers. They believe that he is deeply and genuinely appreciative of their service. They could not like, love, or respect anyone more than President Bush. Most of them did not know they would feel this way, until they had an opportunity to work for him and learn that his manner was genuine and consistent. It has never changed since he began his Presidency. He always treats them with the utmost respect, kindness, and compassion. Please pass this on.
It is important for Americans to have a true understanding of their President.. And also the woman who si currently a candidate for President.
*******************************************************************
You can copy and paste for your emailing convenience.
Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!
I flew 4 Presidential support missions in the C-141 out of Dover AFB, DE.. Two for President Johnson and two for President Nixon. Johnson was a first class jerk and on the two occasions I flew for him, if the Secret Service and their Liaison in the Pentagon hadn't intervened, we would have had to stay on the airplane for hours while he (Johnson) was off somewhere. Nix on never required that and the four (4) stops we made with him he was cordial to the Secret Service and to me and my crew. We had a neighbor when I lived in DC who was part of the secret service presidential detail for many years. His stories of Kennedy and Johnson were the same as those I heard from the guys who flew the presidents' plane, Yes, Kennedy did have Marilyn Monroe flown in for secret "dates," and LBJ was a typical Texas "good ole boy" womanizer. Nixon, Bush 41, and Carter never cheated on their wives. Clinton cheated, but couldn't match Kennedy or LBJ in style or variety. The information below is accurate: The elder Bush and current president Bush make it a point to thank and take care of the air crews who fly them around. When the president flies, there are several planes that also go, one carries the armored limo, another the security detail, plus usually a press aircraft. Both B ushes made it a point to stay home on holidays, so the Air Force and security people could have a day with their families. Hillary Clinton was arrogant and orally abusive to her security detail. She forbade her daughter, Chelsea, from exchanging pleasantries with them. Sometimes Chelsea, miffed at her mother's obvious conceit and mean spiritedness, ignored her demands and exchanged pleasantries regardless, but never in her mother's presence. Chelsea really was a nice, kindhearted, and lovely young lady. The consensus opinion was that Chelsea loved her Mom but did not like her. Hillary Clinton was continuously rude and abrasive to those who were charged to protect her life. Her security detail dutifully did their job, as professionals should, but they all loathed her and wanted to be on a different detail. Hillary Clinton was despised by the Secret Service as a whole. Former President Bill Clinton was much more amia ble than his wife. Often the Secret Service would cringe at the verbal attacks Hillary would use against her husband. They were embarrassed for his sake by the manner and frequency in which she verbally insulted him, sometimes in the presence of the Secret Service, and sometimes behind closed doors. Even behind closed doors Hillary Clinton would scream and holler so loudly that everyone could hear what she was saying. Many felt sorry for President Clinton and most wondered why he tolerated it instead of just divorcing his "attack dog" wife. It was crystal clear that the Clintons neither liked nor respected each other and this was true long before the Monica Lewinsky scandal. Theirs was genuinely a "marriage of convenience." Chelsea was much closer to her father than her mother, even after the Lewinsky scandal, which hurt her gravely. Bill Clinton did in fact have charisma, and occasionally would smile at or shake hands with his security detail. Still, he always displayed an obvious air of superiority towards them. His security detail uniformly believed him to be disingenuous, false, and that he did nothing without a motive that in some way would enhance his image and political career. He was polite, but not kind. They did not particularly like him and nobody trusted him.
Al Gore was the male version of Hillary Clinton. They were friendlier toward each other than either of them were towards former President Clinton. They were not intimate, so please don't read that in. They were very close in a political way. Tipper Gore was generally nice and pleasant. She initially liked Hillary but soon after the election she had her "pegged" and no longer liked her or associated with her except for events that were politically obligatory. Al Gore was far more left wing than Bill Clinton. Al Gore resented Bill Clinton and thought he was too "centrist." He despised all Republicans. His hatred was bitter and this was long before he announced for the Presidency. This hatred was something that he and Hillary had in common. They often said as much, even in the presence of their security detail. Neither of them trusted Bill Clinton and, the Secret Service opined, neither of them even liked him. Bill Clinton did have some good qualities, whereas Al Gore and Hillary had none, in the view of their security details. Al Gore, like Hillary, was very rude and arrogant toward his security detail. He was extremely unappreciative and would not hesitate to scold them in the presence of their peers for minor details over which they had no control. Al Gore also looked down on them, as they finally observed and learned with certainty on one occasion. Al got angry at his offspring and pointed at his security detail and said, "Do you want to grow up and be like the m?" Word of this insult by the former Vice-President quickly spread and he became as disliked by the Secret Service as Hillary. Most of them prayed Al Gore would not be elected President, and they really did have private celebrations in a few of their homes after President Bush won. This was not necessarily to celebrate President Bush's election, but to celebrate Al Gore's defeat. Everyone in the Secret Service wants to be on First Lady Laura Bush's detail. Without exception, they concede that she is perhaps the nicest and most kind person they have ever had the privilege of serving. Where Hillary patently refused to allow her picture to be taken with her security detail, Laura Bush doesn't even have to be asked, she offers. She doesn't just shake their hand and say, "Thank you." Very often, she will give members of her detail a kindhearted hug to express her appreciation. There is nothing false about her. This is her genuine nature. Her security detail considers her to be a "breath of fresh air." They joke that comparing Laura Bush with Hillary Clinton is like comparing "Mother Teresa" with the "Wicked Witch of the North." Likewise, the Secret Service considers President Bush to be a gem of a man to work for. He always treats them with genuine respect and he always trusts and listens to their expert advice.
They really like the Crawford, Texas detail. Every time the president goes to Crawford he has a Bar-B-Q for his security detail and he helps serve their meals. He sits with them, eats with them, and talks with them.. He knows each of them by their first name, and calls them by their first name as a show of affection. He always asks about their family, the names of which he always remembers. They believe that he is deeply and genuinely appreciative of their service. They could not like, love, or respect anyone more than President Bush. Most of them did not know they would feel this way, until they had an opportunity to work for him and learn that his manner was genuine and consistent. It has never changed since he began his Presidency. He always treats them with the utmost respect, kindness, and compassion. Please pass this on.
It is important for Americans to have a true understanding of their President.. And also the woman who si currently a candidate for President.
*******************************************************************
You can copy and paste for your emailing convenience.
Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!
Labels:
Democrats,
Republicans,
Secret Service,
The President
Wednesday, January 9, 2008
Clinton and Obama, For Better Or Worse?
here.
I'm sure most of you who have taken an interest in politics, and are likewise concerned for the future of America can all agree that we need change in America.
However, how bad we need change, and we do, no question about that, it is not a time in which we can afford to let the emotions of the change movement to pull us away from reality and into irrational decision making. There is too much at stake for the future of this Great Nation to be put into the hands of folks who will lead it much further into the gutter than it already is.
Then the issue is not just about change, so much anymore, but more about experience as opposed to a message that sounds appealing at first, while in the high emotions of change, but in all likelihood, would probably not materialize. So, the merits of the message aren't actual fact until put into actions and results taken effect.
America needs Leadership and Experience combined with a strategy for the long term safety issues that are imperative on a National as well as worldwide level. Islamic Jihad will remain a front-burner issue beyond the forseeable future.
In the voter block of the Democratic party, the two leading candidates - Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are competing for the title of the Presidency; with an overwhelming majority in support of Obama, with a large percentage of these being of the younger voter base.
It is a good thing that younger folks are taking an interest in politics. However, the not so good part, or sad part I should say, about all this, though, is that the Liberal indoctrination within our schools, colleges, and universities is showing badly. The wise-cracks that think they've "been there, done that." And can tell people the "best course" of action only shows that they've never been under the pressure of 300,000,000 people burdening their consciences. Especially with somebody like Obama who has no notable record of leadership.
What happens if an inexperienced nomad becomes our next President? As an old saying goes, and still true to this day, you play with fire, and sooner or later, you're going to get burned." *Chuckles* That's about the gist of it.
However, it is sometimes a good thing to feel the return effect of one's actions. That way, you've got the experience to avoid getting burned again in the future. LOL!
As experience is the greatest motivator for making wise decisions, for those with a a few years under your hat; you know, that history has proven the candidates credentials without any second guessing when it comes to their qualifications to become President--Such is the case, when we look at the record of the New York Senator and former First Lady Hillary Rohdam Clinton. Just to name a fraction of scandals that she and her husband have been in - Rose Law firm - Whitewater - Waco burnings. Most of which, were during Fr. President Clinton's administration. Of much greater importance, However, and added to this is her extreme Liberal agenda on both the Social and Economic issues alike, and Nation Security as a bonus (If you can call it that-lol).
On Social issues, she's for homosexuality, she's for murdering the unborn, she wants sanctions to place "Hate crimes" bill to silence pastors and preists for preaching against sinful lifestyles and leading people to Christ. In so doing, this bill would violate the right to free speech and of religion.
Thinking of Hillary Rodham Clinton on economic terms is probably about as bad as thinking of a broken Jaw Bone. She's in favor of raising taxes on the Rich and working class, courtesy of Illegal immigrants; with "free" healthcare and welfare subsidies. While working-families strive to barely put food on the table. A five-thousand $ subsidy for every child born every single day of the year.
On National Security, Hillary is the worst, the breakdown in the level of security would put America at worst risk since before 9/11. Hillary said to a crowd in New Hampshire Monday, concerning a question that Bill Oreilly had posed which was asked by a HIllary fan at the primary--She said, and I quote--the first thing I will do if I become President, I'm going to ask for permission (from Congress) to begin pulling Troops out of Iraq within sixty days. So that tells you right there that she cares nothing for this country and the sacrifice that is required to keep this Nation safe.
So, if you're thinking on the lines of change, and Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton as your choice candidate...All you need to do, is look at each of their track records - LOL! - to see if you want to risk getting burned!
Hillary with a dangerous agenda and a clearly horrible record.
Obama with no record of Leadership and a Liberal agenda.
Think about it.
~ Jeremiah
Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!
I'm sure most of you who have taken an interest in politics, and are likewise concerned for the future of America can all agree that we need change in America.
However, how bad we need change, and we do, no question about that, it is not a time in which we can afford to let the emotions of the change movement to pull us away from reality and into irrational decision making. There is too much at stake for the future of this Great Nation to be put into the hands of folks who will lead it much further into the gutter than it already is.
Then the issue is not just about change, so much anymore, but more about experience as opposed to a message that sounds appealing at first, while in the high emotions of change, but in all likelihood, would probably not materialize. So, the merits of the message aren't actual fact until put into actions and results taken effect.
America needs Leadership and Experience combined with a strategy for the long term safety issues that are imperative on a National as well as worldwide level. Islamic Jihad will remain a front-burner issue beyond the forseeable future.
In the voter block of the Democratic party, the two leading candidates - Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are competing for the title of the Presidency; with an overwhelming majority in support of Obama, with a large percentage of these being of the younger voter base.
It is a good thing that younger folks are taking an interest in politics. However, the not so good part, or sad part I should say, about all this, though, is that the Liberal indoctrination within our schools, colleges, and universities is showing badly. The wise-cracks that think they've "been there, done that." And can tell people the "best course" of action only shows that they've never been under the pressure of 300,000,000 people burdening their consciences. Especially with somebody like Obama who has no notable record of leadership.
What happens if an inexperienced nomad becomes our next President? As an old saying goes, and still true to this day, you play with fire, and sooner or later, you're going to get burned." *Chuckles* That's about the gist of it.
However, it is sometimes a good thing to feel the return effect of one's actions. That way, you've got the experience to avoid getting burned again in the future. LOL!
As experience is the greatest motivator for making wise decisions, for those with a a few years under your hat; you know, that history has proven the candidates credentials without any second guessing when it comes to their qualifications to become President--Such is the case, when we look at the record of the New York Senator and former First Lady Hillary Rohdam Clinton. Just to name a fraction of scandals that she and her husband have been in - Rose Law firm - Whitewater - Waco burnings. Most of which, were during Fr. President Clinton's administration. Of much greater importance, However, and added to this is her extreme Liberal agenda on both the Social and Economic issues alike, and Nation Security as a bonus (If you can call it that-lol).
On Social issues, she's for homosexuality, she's for murdering the unborn, she wants sanctions to place "Hate crimes" bill to silence pastors and preists for preaching against sinful lifestyles and leading people to Christ. In so doing, this bill would violate the right to free speech and of religion.
Thinking of Hillary Rodham Clinton on economic terms is probably about as bad as thinking of a broken Jaw Bone. She's in favor of raising taxes on the Rich and working class, courtesy of Illegal immigrants; with "free" healthcare and welfare subsidies. While working-families strive to barely put food on the table. A five-thousand $ subsidy for every child born every single day of the year.
On National Security, Hillary is the worst, the breakdown in the level of security would put America at worst risk since before 9/11. Hillary said to a crowd in New Hampshire Monday, concerning a question that Bill Oreilly had posed which was asked by a HIllary fan at the primary--She said, and I quote--the first thing I will do if I become President, I'm going to ask for permission (from Congress) to begin pulling Troops out of Iraq within sixty days. So that tells you right there that she cares nothing for this country and the sacrifice that is required to keep this Nation safe.
So, if you're thinking on the lines of change, and Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton as your choice candidate...All you need to do, is look at each of their track records - LOL! - to see if you want to risk getting burned!
Hillary with a dangerous agenda and a clearly horrible record.
Obama with no record of Leadership and a Liberal agenda.
Think about it.
~ Jeremiah
Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!
Labels:
Clintons,
Democrats,
Election 2008,
Obama,
Presidency
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
HILLARY GOES PUBLIC WITH PRIVATE FAITH
Washington -
Hmmmmmm ....... Yeah, I know, smells kinda fishy doesn't it?
Bottom line: If this is so, then Hillary would have changed her conclusions on ethically moral issues such as Abortion.
If she has been influenced by evangelicals then she would be united with biblical morality, which is the ONLY morality there is. Concerning Abortion it would mean that she would go from Pro-Murdering to Pro-defending of life in the womb. The latest opportunity Hillary had to make that change publicly was when the Supreme Court was making the decision banning partial-post-birth abortion. What was her statement regarding that decision? "Oooh, they've made a terrible mistake", she cried. Barack Obama made the same statement. The both of them have fallen way off the left-wing charts long ago. Extreme nut-wing Democrats.
So don't be fooled by her rhetorical persuasions by her touting her Methodist upbringing, and clergyman friends. That means absolutely nothing, and proves absolutely nothing about her as a Christian. She's a hypocrite! Her actions have proven it!
BTW, to speak of Sojourners as "the liberal evangelical group", is nonsense. If one is evangelical, one is not liberal. One is theologically Conservative. Sojourners has been known to appear evangelical, but often learning far too much in the leftward, left-tard direction.
Anyways, back to Ms. Clinton ... Ms. Clinton is as slick as the Pharisees, as smooth a talker as the Pharisees in the Republican party she criticizes. Maybe smoother, actually. She knows the evangelical salt shaker well. She states the biblical language, even to quoting Scripture for her convenience. Count in her direction for instance Carter, Obama, Jackson, Sharpton, Edwards, Dean, and hubby Clinton....
But until she changes her position on Abortion, and practicing homosexualtiy for starters, she is the same theological Liberal that she and Bill have always been.
In other words ... Don't trust Hillary when she speaks the Bible, because it's not coming from the Bible, it's coming from the film on her teeth!!!
God bless,
~ Jeremiah
She quoted one of her favorite passages in Scripture – where it says in the Epistle of James that "faith without works is dead." She spoke of "the sustaining power of prayer," and how her own faith journey is approaching the half-century mark. She applauded the work of churches in ministering to the sick, as Jesus did.
"For many of us the golden rule calls on us to act," she said.
Hmmmmmm ....... Yeah, I know, smells kinda fishy doesn't it?
Bottom line: If this is so, then Hillary would have changed her conclusions on ethically moral issues such as Abortion.
If she has been influenced by evangelicals then she would be united with biblical morality, which is the ONLY morality there is. Concerning Abortion it would mean that she would go from Pro-Murdering to Pro-defending of life in the womb. The latest opportunity Hillary had to make that change publicly was when the Supreme Court was making the decision banning partial-post-birth abortion. What was her statement regarding that decision? "Oooh, they've made a terrible mistake", she cried. Barack Obama made the same statement. The both of them have fallen way off the left-wing charts long ago. Extreme nut-wing Democrats.
So don't be fooled by her rhetorical persuasions by her touting her Methodist upbringing, and clergyman friends. That means absolutely nothing, and proves absolutely nothing about her as a Christian. She's a hypocrite! Her actions have proven it!
BTW, to speak of Sojourners as "the liberal evangelical group", is nonsense. If one is evangelical, one is not liberal. One is theologically Conservative. Sojourners has been known to appear evangelical, but often learning far too much in the leftward, left-tard direction.
Anyways, back to Ms. Clinton ... Ms. Clinton is as slick as the Pharisees, as smooth a talker as the Pharisees in the Republican party she criticizes. Maybe smoother, actually. She knows the evangelical salt shaker well. She states the biblical language, even to quoting Scripture for her convenience. Count in her direction for instance Carter, Obama, Jackson, Sharpton, Edwards, Dean, and hubby Clinton....
But until she changes her position on Abortion, and practicing homosexualtiy for starters, she is the same theological Liberal that she and Bill have always been.
In other words ... Don't trust Hillary when she speaks the Bible, because it's not coming from the Bible, it's coming from the film on her teeth!!!
God bless,
~ Jeremiah
Monday, December 17, 2007
REPUBLICANS SCORE GREAT GAINS IN DIVIDENDS ACTION
Washington -
Needless to say, from the very first day that President Bush stepped into office, to this very day, Democrats have fought tooth and nail to pin President Bush to his duties as Commander in Chief and force, override (however you want to say it), a reckless agenda of defeat of the War on Terror, they have tried defunding, withdrawal...every trick in the book of Democrat playbook. And there's more...
Even after Nancy Pelosi and her cabal have called out some asinine steps for defeat, they moved to pass on top of the already massive spending bill, on cap-spending, they asked for an estimated extra 23 - 33,000,000,000 for other tax and spend programs ... benefits for illegals, welfare entitlements, SCHIP for low income families, and so forth.
It is a proven fact that as far as matters constraint are concerned, and spendings sake for that matter, Democrats just don't cut the slack, or 'get it' for that matter. They must think money "grows on trees," or something.
Although Democrats have Majority rule of the House in Congress, and even so...divided the country, Republicans have remained united and strong, and thus, been able to move with discretionary actions to keep things running and on time. More to the point, President Bush has a huge victory in working toward a worthy cause with his fine constituency of capable Leaders, by being able to continue the funding of our Honorable men and women in uniform who fight for our freedoms every single day.
Folks, we are truly blessed, to have a President with such Courage as our honorable Commander in Chief President George W. Bush ... to face the libel they (Democrats) spew forth on a daily basis about him, and not only only the Democratic officials in the hallowed halls of our Congress, but the people on the web sites such as Daily Kos, Democrat underground, MoveOn.org, and others who spew out some horrible, horrible stuff about our President.
To be able to take out the stuff those Web sites spew forth every single day, you've got somebody to be thankful too ... and you know who that is? ... Almighty God Creator of All that is and all that ever will be. Make no mistake, you can be proud to call yourself an 'American' with the man that is in the White House now.
Let him know how much you appreciate him this Christmas Season, and write him a special Thank You for putting up with the stuff that is put out against him every day on Daily Kos and others, But more importantly...
Thank him for protecting you, your family, and America!!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
~ Jeremiah
Heading into the last days of the legislative session, Republicans in Congress and President Bush are chalking up some surprising victories on federal spending.
That has put Democrats on the defensive. From a campaign pledge to change the course of the war in Iraq to tax and spending plans, Democrats are now having to scuttle key elements of their agenda. The extent of their retrenchment will become clear this week as Congress moves to pass key spending bills.
Needless to say, from the very first day that President Bush stepped into office, to this very day, Democrats have fought tooth and nail to pin President Bush to his duties as Commander in Chief and force, override (however you want to say it), a reckless agenda of defeat of the War on Terror, they have tried defunding, withdrawal...every trick in the book of Democrat playbook. And there's more...
Even after Nancy Pelosi and her cabal have called out some asinine steps for defeat, they moved to pass on top of the already massive spending bill, on cap-spending, they asked for an estimated extra 23 - 33,000,000,000 for other tax and spend programs ... benefits for illegals, welfare entitlements, SCHIP for low income families, and so forth.
It is a proven fact that as far as matters constraint are concerned, and spendings sake for that matter, Democrats just don't cut the slack, or 'get it' for that matter. They must think money "grows on trees," or something.
Although Democrats have Majority rule of the House in Congress, and even so...divided the country, Republicans have remained united and strong, and thus, been able to move with discretionary actions to keep things running and on time. More to the point, President Bush has a huge victory in working toward a worthy cause with his fine constituency of capable Leaders, by being able to continue the funding of our Honorable men and women in uniform who fight for our freedoms every single day.
Folks, we are truly blessed, to have a President with such Courage as our honorable Commander in Chief President George W. Bush ... to face the libel they (Democrats) spew forth on a daily basis about him, and not only only the Democratic officials in the hallowed halls of our Congress, but the people on the web sites such as Daily Kos, Democrat underground, MoveOn.org, and others who spew out some horrible, horrible stuff about our President.
To be able to take out the stuff those Web sites spew forth every single day, you've got somebody to be thankful too ... and you know who that is? ... Almighty God Creator of All that is and all that ever will be. Make no mistake, you can be proud to call yourself an 'American' with the man that is in the White House now.
Let him know how much you appreciate him this Christmas Season, and write him a special Thank You for putting up with the stuff that is put out against him every day on Daily Kos and others, But more importantly...
Thank him for protecting you, your family, and America!!
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
~ Jeremiah
Labels:
Democrats,
Freedom,
George W. Bush,
Leadership,
legislation,
Partisan Division,
Republicans,
taxation
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)