How Muslims Treat Little Children

I just wonder what a little 9 year old girl would do to deserve the treatment that she did at the hands of these tyrants who are filled with Satan. Undoubtedly, the little girl was a Christian, her and her parents...because that is how Muslims treat Christians...or anyone who renounces Islam, and are proclaimed by the Muslims to be the "Infidels".

With evidence like that, what more do we need to know about Islam, to know that it is not at all a "peaceful" religion?


Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!

Lies vs. Fact

I found this article quite interesting, and paraphrasing, it says ... Asif Ali Zardari, President of Pakistan says Islam is a "religion of peace and tranquillity"...

Perhaps Mr. Zardari has not taken into account the many stacks, upon stacks, upon stacks of dead people, and mass graves of those whose deaths are directly attributable to the murderous activity and intent of Muslim terrorists.

It is doubtless that deaths tied to Muslim terrorism date all the way back to the time Ishmael, who is the forefather of our modern day Muslim terrorists, they were a warring tribe then, and continue to be a warring people to this day. And also doubtless, is the fact that the murders committed by these people were done on a daily basis from that time period until now. So the numbers must run into the millions...of people that have been murdered by Muslims.

Just to give you an example of this, we can go to a site that keeps a quite large data-base recorded to support these facts at this site - http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/ - on the site's main page, it shows that over the past two days that nearly three dozen people have been murdered in differing locations throughout the world.

As far as I can tell, this site started tracking murders by Muslims back to 2001. So that's just a tiny fraction of the numbers that go all the way back to the starting time of Muslim terrorism. So, between communism and Islam we can only estimate how many people have suffered to the hands of the dictator and terrorist-minded.

So, with that said, I hope you will think about these things, and spread the word, so that those who are spreading mis-information will be exposed, such as those like the President of Pakistan.





Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!

Muslim Terrorism in Egypt

From Washington Times, Muslims declare more Jihad on Christians, their churches and their communities in Egypt. 12 dead, and over 200 injured.

This all over a few Muslims who are converting to, and turning to the truth of Christianity.

It is no wonder, seeing how Islamists treat their women, and children as human shields in fighting, and as slaves.

Pray for these communities, their families and others in the Middle East as they struggle with the ever-present threat of Muslim terrorism of that region.

Islam On The Mexican/U.S. Border

Warning: Extremely Graphic content. Viewer's Discretion is Strongly Advised.

This is the mind of the enemy we have, folks. How many more actions like these will have to be displayed before people begin to wake up and see that we have an enemy who seeks to destroy our very way of life, who come in the name of a false god called "Allah," and under a false prophet by the name of "Muhammad."

Who in his right mind would call something like this good?

Only someone so possessed of Satan and his demons that they cannot see any longer, but are blinded by the darkness that has taken over their minds completely.

Whether it's a drug cartel leader, or an Islamic leader, there is not two cents worth of difference between the two in terms of mentality. They have control on their minds, and murder in their hearts to get to that control.

These beheadings as well as many others, are taking place just across our borders in the country/state of Mexico, joining the United States. Islamic terrorists are being smuggled in by the drug cartels that are infiltrating the United States by the Mexicans. Their aim is to infiltrate the so-called "moderate" Muslim communities in America to "radicalize" them.

Why the word "moderate" when we have the groups Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood and other Muslim terrorist sleeper cells all over this country, just waiting for the opportunity to become un-moderate and unleash attacks on the American people?

Friends, we need a serious heart change here in America, we need to get the word out and stop our young people from being blinded by these politically correct dogma espoused to them by their left-wing professors.

We need to turn back to the God of Creation, and just hope that He spares us from unleashing His wrath.

In Case You Didn't Know

Chilling, is it not?

Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!

Feds want to seize Muslim-owned properties (OneNewsNow.com)

A U.S.-based terrorism expert suggests that the recent announcement by federal authorities that they intend to seize property owned by an Iranian-owned Islamic foundation is just the "tip of the iceberg."

Federal prosecutors have announced they are taking steps to seize four U.S. mosques and a New York City skyscraper owned by a nonprofit Muslim organization. The organization -- the Alavi Foundation -- has long been suspected of being under the control of the Iranian government. Prosecutors say the Foundation has been helping to illegally funnel money back to the Iranian government.

The U.S. government filed a forfeiture action in federal court in New York to seize the four mosques, which are located in that city and in Maryland, California, and Houston. The government also wants to take control of a 36-story office tower on New York's Fifth Avenue. The filing starts what could be a drawn-out legal process.

Read full story...Feds want to seize Muslim-owned properties (OneNewsNow.com)

Feel free to share your thoughts.

Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!

Thoughts on The Ft. Hood Massacre

First of all, my heart goes out to all the families of those who lost loved ones in this truly terrifying act of cruelty. What a sad day for them. May God surround them with His love and protection as they try to make amends at this time in their lives. Good can come of tragedies such as these through Almighty God's undying love for His people.

It is hard at times, really, to make sense of it all, and why someone would commit to such a horrible act of violence. False assumptions can be made very easily when resorting to personal feelings, and is why we must rely on something greater than ourselves for the answers to the questions relating to matters such as these.

In a world filled with so many lies, we have the Word of the One which has stood the test of time, and His Word never fails.

Romans 1:22 states - "Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things."

When we show intellectual arrogance before Almighty God, we display a reversed sense of values; our worship is exchanged for devotion to man-made and man-reflecting idols. Our indelible sense of worship is perverted by being centered on the wrong object/objects. We then exchange everything that God has shown us for a lie. And this is undeniably what has happened in the realm of the violence being perpetrated by others of the Islamic faith, their faith being directed to a man-centered/reflected idol ... their idol, Muhammad.

The man who committed to this act of cruelty Nidal Malik Hasan, was said to have screamed "Allahu Akbar" just before firing on the soldiers there at the U.S. Army military base there in Ft. Hood Texas. What is the meaning of "Allahu Akbar"? According to those who follow the Islamic religion, it means "God is the greatest." Care must be taken not to associate God with the violence that this man committed, because God does not condone the act of murder in His name or any name. This man committed murder because of his idolization of the false prophet who was Muhammad; and rest assured, Muhammad was no prophet, but is an idol to many, and has perverted the thinking of many, and many more millions have been murdered through his murderous, rage-filled ideology. Islamics simply worship the wrong object, and it is sheer hypocrisy to proclaim God's name and then murder people as the Muslims do.

Muslims need to know that they have a Savior in whom they can be forgiven of their sin and have eternal life! They can discover that Jesus Christ died for their sins and rose from the grave to offer them Salvation, of which ... no amount of work or good deeds could buy. This new life God freely gives to all who call upon His name!

God bless you, and thank you for reading!



Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!

Rifqa returns to Ohio to face Muslim parents (OneNewsNow.com)

Some very sad, and troubling news...

COLUMBUS, OH - Rifqa Bary is back in Ohio after running away to Florida because she said she feared her father would harm or kill her for converting from Islam to Christianity.

The Florida Department of Children and Families says 17-year-old Bary arrived in Columbus Tuesday accompanied by a state social worker and a Florida police officer. She is now in the custody of Franklin County Children Services, which was given control of her case earlier this month pending her arrival back in Ohio. Bary will stay with a foster family and undergo counseling.

Earlier Tuesday an Ohio judge ordered the state to supervise Bary's telephone and Internet use at the request of Children Services.

Read the full story:Rifqa returns to Ohio to face Muslim parents (OneNewsNow.com)

Please pray for Rifqa Bary as she is returned to a foster family near her parents.

Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!

Taming The Savages

See what the Military Religious Freedom Foundation is whining about now!

"Travel the Road", a popular Christian reality TV series produced by the Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN), follows the travels of Will Decker and Tim Scott, two "extreme" missionaries, as they circle the world fulfilling their mission -- “Preach the Gospel to the ends of the earth and encourage the church to be active in the Great Commission.”

Season 2 of this series ended with three episodes filmed in Afghanistan -- Journey to the Line: Afghanistan: Part 1, Terrors of the Night: Afghanistan: Part 2, and Fog of War: Afghanistan: Part 3. For these episodes, the missionaries were completely embedded and, thus, actually permitted to stay on U.S. military bases, travel with a public affairs unit, and accompany and film troops on patrols, all for the purpose of evangelizing Afghanis and producing a television show promoting the Christian religion. The number of DoD Public Affairs regulations violated in the military's participation and assistance in producing a religious program alone is staggering, not to mention other violations (including constitutional) documented in the content of the program, which include the outrageous violation of the United States Central Command's General Order 1-A, which absolutely prohibits any proselytization whatsoever in the Middle Eastern theater of operations. In complete disregard of this bedrock standing order, the U.S. Army facilitated these evangelizing Christian missionaries in their distribution of New Testaments in the Arabic native language ("Darri" dialect) to the Afghani people.

The clips in this video are all from the program's third Afghanistan episode, with the e xception of the second clip, which is from the first episode. The chaplain in that clip, who expresses his delight about being able to talk to the Afghani people about Christianity and the possibility of a "revival" in their country, is Capt. Brad Hanna of the Oklahoma National Guard. After returning from Afghanistan, Capt. Hanna was made a full-time support chaplain for the Oklahoma National Guard. Also facilitating the numerous constitutional, regulation, and general order violations perpetrated in the making of these episodes was SSgt. Sheldon Hoyt, who was in Afghanistan at the time with Oklahoma National Guard's 45th Brigade Combat Team, 1st Battalion, 179th Infantry Regiment. SSgt. Hoyt, who is frequently mentioned by the evangelizing Christian missionaries throughout the "Travel the Road" episodes, appears to have been more involved with their crusade than just being assigned by the Army to assist them, being a regular participant on the "Travel the Road" internet message board that they hosted for several years.

To right thinking people across the nation, this gives Americans an opportunity to exterminate the source of 9/11, Islam, at its laughable roots. America cannot tolerate the existance of a religion that demands America's extermination, just as America cannot tolerate a country that threatens its allies. Liberals, as always, demand that we allow Islam to exist, and stop our efforts to eradicate it. Their screams of protest should not dissuade the righteous and the sane, however, for these are the same people who want to 'sit down and talk' with a nation that wants to 'wipe Israel off the map'.

The usage of military resources and troops is paramount in their mission. The military is the only American organization that won't be attacked by every single Afghan; it is also the only American organization that can adequately protect these missionaries. The missionaries have also shown themselves to be vital in securing Afghanistan, as they have significantly improved the infrastructure in Kadanhar. Yet liberals, with howls that pierce a Nemean Lion's skin, will bawl that American taxpayer money is being used for a religious organization, and that all activity from these missionaries must immediately cease. Their opinions should not matter to us, though, for who likes to spend taxpayer money on worthless social nets while simultaneously cutting funding from the military? Heeding their roars would be foolish, as they do not exist.

In conclusion, I would like to share one of their videos with you. Not only are these missionaries vital to the Afghan people, the videos are used in my children's homeschooling lessons, so it would be a significant loss for us if this television program discontinues.

Iraq Is In A Crisis!

Now, thanks to the new Democrat-controlled government, we get to be pushed around by Islamofascists:

BAGHDAD — Iraq’s cabinet on Sunday overwhelmingly approved a proposed security agreement that calls for a full withdrawal of American forces from the country by the end of 2011. The cabinet’s decision brings a final date for the departure of American troops a significant step closer after more than five and a half years of war.

The proposed pact must still be approved by Iraq’s Parliament, in a vote scheduled to take place in a week. But leaders of some of the largest parliamentary blocs expressed confidence that with the backing of most Shiites and Kurds they had enough support to ensure its approval.

Hooray! We now get to be pushed around by the militant wing of the Islamofascists, the Shiites. A President Obama would be either an idiot or a morally corrupt mongrel if he were to cave in to the same group of Islamists that caused 9/11, propped up Saddam Hussein and his Palestinian goons, and runs the clergy in Iran. As for the Kurds, they are also fanatic cowards. Not only are they fundamentally opposed to our Turkish allies, they have received tacit endorsements from Democrats, who are trying to desperately usher in the Armenians into their Kum-Bay-Ah circle. However, maintaining a Kurdish state would have a tactical side to it: we would keep the unspeakably perverse Iranians from expanding westwards. If we cannot maintain a Sunni state in Iraq's north, then we must resolve the tension with a Kurdish State.

Perhaps punishing the Turks, who have not fully cooperated with Operation Iraqi Freedom, would soon be just. But, as of now, we have bigger Islamist shrimp to fry.

Twenty-seven of the 28 cabinet ministers who were present at the two-and-a-half-hour session voted in favor of the pact. Nine ministers were absent. The nearly unanimous vote was a victory for the dominant Shiite party and its Kurdish partners. Widespread Sunni opposition could doom the proposed pact even if it has the votes to pass, as it would call into question whether there was a true national consensus, which Shiite leaders consider essential.

The proposed agreement, which took nearly a year to negotiate with the United States, not only sets a date for American troop withdrawal, but puts new restrictions on American combat operations in Iraq starting Jan. 1 and requires an American military pullback from urban areas by June 30. Those hard dates reflect a significant concession by the departing Bush administration, which had been publicly averse to timetables.

The Democrats hate the Sunnis, who at least have some semblance of sanity remaining. Freedom for the Iraqis requires Sunni cooperation and compliance, something which they would be willing to provide if we have strong leadership. Democrats also do not like the existence of the Green Zone, for reasons I cannot contemplate. Why they would be so willing to watch the Green Zone collapse and be infested by Islamist roaches is beyond me.

As for President Bush, shame on him for capitulating to the Democrats and Shiites. Islam's constructs mandate that it cannot settle any debates without a threatening exterior force goading it on. The Islamists may support this legislation, but that is only because they are unified in their opposition to America and democracy. These savages only understand negotiations at the barrel of a gun, and I say that we don't back down an inch.

Iraq also obtained a significant degree of jurisdiction in some cases over serious crimes committed by Americans who are off duty and not on bases.

The only good Islamist is a dead Islamist. The Sunnis have no need to be killed, but as for the Shiites, let them die. We should just carpet bomb the cities they exert an iron grip over, yet our Administration is too encumbered by Democrat efforts to undermine the War on Terror to do so. The fact that our troops have to take this matter on themselves is disappointing; they should NOT be prosecuted for exerting righteousness.

In Washington, the White House welcomed the vote as “an important and positive step” and attributed the agreement itself to security improvements in the past year.

Throughout the negotiations, the Shiite parties and the prime minister, Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, under pressure from forces both within and outside the country, had been trying to strike a balance in forging a viable agreement with the Americans that would guarantee Iraq’s security and that would still stand firm against what many, including neighboring Iran, consider a hostile force that has occupied Iraq since the spring 2003 invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein.

“This vote shows that the Iraqis have figured out how to stand up for themselves, to Iran and to the U.S.,” said Michael E. O’Hanlon, a specialist on Iraq at the Brookings Institution. “They will have stared in the face at the various options and concluded that none are ideal, but the best for their security is an amount of ongoing but finite American cooperation, while also indicating their strong desire to run their own country on their own as soon as possible.”

We've won the war, but we have much to do. Withdrawing from this region will reduce our influence in both the Middle East, and the world market as a whole. Until we can induce the entire Middle East to regard our troops as allies, our job is not done. Until unbridled capitalism flourishes in the soon-to-be former Islamic states, our job is not done.

American officials said the accord was the result of tough bargaining by the Iraqis. Speaking about the negotiations a few days before the cabinet vote, Ryan C. Crocker, the American ambassador, said of the 100 requests for changes sought by the Iraqi side in recent weeks: “Some were substantive, some were linguistic, some were stylistic. We looked at it all; we were as forthcoming as we could possibly be in responding.” Some Iraqi Shiite politicians said a significant factor in the cabinet decision was the approval of the pact by Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the most influential Shiite cleric in Iraq, who from the outset had laid down three conditions: full Iraqi sovereignty, transparency and majority support for the pact.

Sheik Dhia al-Din al-Fayyadh, a member of the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, one of the largest Shiite parties, said the ayatollah did not consent until a delegation of Shiite leaders visited him on Saturday to assure him that those conditions were met. “We told him that we had got as close as we could possibly get,” Mr. Fayyadh said. “We didn’t get everything, but almost.”

Ali al-Dabbagh, the Iraqi government spokesman, said the agreement allowed for the possibility that American forces could withdraw even earlier if Iraqi forces were in a position to take over security responsibilities earlier. He also said either side had the right to cancel the agreement with one year’s notice.

This is just stupid. We've given birth to freedom, but can you let a newborn just run off? No. You have to nurture it to the point where it's self-providing, and to the point where it delivers you unbridled trust. I would think that trusting a Shiite cleric would be anathema to freedom, but that's what I've come to expect from Leftist judgments.

Several political analysts suggested that Iranian opposition to the pact had softened because of the American presidential election victory of Senator Barack Obama. He has suggested a more diplomatic approach to Tehran and has described a withdrawal timetable from Iraq faster even than the one laid out in the security agreement, though recently he has qualified that stance.

“If George Bush’s presidency were going to continue on through 2012, I think people would be a lot more concerned,” said Karim Sadjadpour, a Middle East analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “Having this administration really lightens the blow for the Iranians.”

Bush could actually kill or subdue you people. Barack Obama is too limpwristed to do so. That's why you're so afraid of us. We're in a regional war, and the only way we can accurately win it is to treat the entire reagon as threatening. Barack Obama, who wants to talk with villians that want to nuke the largest lighthouse of liberty in the Middle East, would surely treat the rest of the savages with respect they don't deserve.

A section of the agreement that Iraqi officials said barred the United States from launching attacks on neighboring countries from Iraq also may have diminished Iranian resistance.

“We sent messages to neighboring countries to say, ‘This is in our interest,’ ” said Mr. Fayyadh, the Shiite lawmaker. “Specifically we spoke to the Iranians and gave them guarantees that ‘no one will use our country to attack you.’ ” There was no immediate reaction from Iran to the vote.

In many ways, the vote can be seen as a calculated judgment by the Iraqi leaders as to who, for now, is best positioned to guarantee their political survival. It was the United States, after all, that helped usher many of the current Iraqi leaders into power and, given the improved but still fragile security situation in the country, many still see a need for an American military presence.

We certainly need to keep the current Iraqi government, yet we also need to weed out the Shiite extremists among them. Thanks to our premature introduction of democracy to the Iraqi people, the blubbering morons voted in a bunch of Shiite-sympathizing extremists that are now beholden to the terrorists politically. The last thing we need to do is to withdraw our troops and their Blackwater allies.

The presence of American troops in Iraq is governed by a United Nations resolution that expires Dec. 31. If the pact is not approved and if the Security Council were to balk at extending it, the Americans say their forces in Iraq would have to cease operations. As if to underscore the risks of no agreement, violence spiked in the two weeks leading up to the cabinet vote; on Sunday the heightened attacks included a car bombing that killed 10 in Diyala Province.

It remains unclear how hardened opponents of the agreement might respond, particularly followers of the anti-American Shiite cleric Moktada al-Sadr. After the cabinet vote, Sadrist politicians, reiterating their opposition to the accord, claimed that as a procedural matter, parliamentary approval would require a two-thirds majority. Supporters say a simple majority will suffice.

Right. This is the same United Nations that helped Syria hide Saddam's WMDs. Yep, that's who I want to trust! Naturally, the Iraqi people are slaves to their United Nations overloards.

In a statement released Sunday night, Mr. Sadr sought once again to position himself as a nationalist opponent of the American-led forces. “I call on the Iraqi Parliament again to refuse this pact without hesitation because it is a deal to sell Iraq and its people,” said Mr. Sadr, who in a statement at Friday Prayer last week also called for armed resistance against the Americans.

He's so close to the truth, yet so far away. Perhaps a few bouts with amnesia could cure that.

Many Sunnis have opposed the pact for the opposite reason: they worry that without the Americans, they could be at the mercy of Iraq’s majority Shiite population and, behind it, the Iranians.

But Tawafiq, the largest Sunni bloc in Parliament, appears to be divided. A little more than a fourth of its members have said they will vote for the agreement, while leaders of the Iraqi Islamic Party, Tawafiq’s largest member party, said they would not approve any agreement without a national referendum, an unlikely development.

The sole minister to vote against the pact on Sunday was a Sunni, and several of the nine ministers who were not present for the vote are Sunni. “The Sunnis are probably hoping for a better deal on other things,” Mr. O’Hanlon said. “Possibly they’ve concluded that this was going to pass anyway so they’d rather take this anti-American stance for their future political benefit.”

I'm astounded at the amount of Sunnis that are complete idiots about their future. Mr. O'Hanlon shares my sentiments. So does the Bush Administration. So do all right-thinking people. Just like a good person would lock his friend in a cage, if that's what it took to keep him from killing himself, we may have to keep these Sunnis under an American government until they can realize that we are their only hope for freedom. The Shiites would merrily slaughter them in a matter of seconds; thanks to the Democrats, several Sunnis were intimidated into making the wrong choice.

Several politicians said an obstacle to Parliament’s approval would be its failure to achieve a quorum, a chronic failing — especially if lawmakers immediately left for Saudi Arabia on the annual Hajj pilgrimage. Parliament quickly sought to thwart that possibility by banning members from traveling abroad.

Several politicians said an obstacle to Parliament’s approval would be its failure to achieve a quorum, a chronic failing — especially if lawmakers immediately left for Saudi Arabia on the annual Hajj pilgrimage. Parliament quickly sought to thwart that possibility by banning members from traveling abroad.

On Sunday, Shiite legislators could barely conceal their delight in the halls of the Parliament building, which still bears the marks of Mr. Hussein’s Baathist government in the form of mosaics depicting American jet bombers flying over defiant Iraqi soldiers. In a sign of their newfound boldness with the Americans, they referred to the pact as the “withdrawal agreement.”

Hadi al-Ameri, a Shiite lawmaker who leads the Badr Organization, the onetime paramilitary wing of the Supreme Council, said Shiites would seek widespread consensus in Parliament.

He also cautioned that they expected a possibly violent reaction from rejectionists, “which would have happened if we signed it, and if we didn’t sign it.”

How could Democrats like 'screw them' Kos support the ascent of such violent extremists into a governmental position? Their utter apathy about the future of the Middle East is astounding.

We have to stay the course; we cannot cut and run now, lest we allow our lighthouse to be swooped away by the Islamist hurricane that, under a Shiite government, would be inevitable. The surge is working, and if we can wallop the Shiites (and possibly the Kurds, depending on their reactions) once and for all, then we can make sure that democracy, free markets, and freedom grow in this utterly deprived region. Although the New York Times may be cheerleaders for this fatal legislation, the American people should cast them aside as egoistic, homicidal maniacs that frown upon freedom. They were the ones that tried to undermine our security at home; it is only natural for them to try to undermine security abroad.

Obama Finally Admits It...

He actually said it ... He finally said it ... "...My Muslim Faith".

This is one of many reasons, but the main reason Obama would be too dangerous a choice for the Presidency of the United States!

Tell all your family and friends. Get the word out!

Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!

Beginning Muslim Lineage

I'm sure many have pondered the question; since Christianity and Islam can be traced back together, where did each get their beginnings? Of which, I hope to shed a little light on.

When most hear of Christianity, they reference with The Holy Bible and Jesus Christ; Who came to redeem mankind froma world of sin; and the future torment that would surely follow had it not been for His Loving grace at the Cross of Calvary.

That's a touch of Christianity. Today, we're going to focus on Islam.

Anyone who has ever heard of Islam, you're probably familiar with a certain name, being that of Muhammad, the "prophet" of "Allah", and beginnings of the religion Islam.

Where does Muhammad trace back to?

Muhammad's line can be traced from the book of Genesis, as we shall find. Every Nation of people on this earth are descendants of Abraham's two sons, each born to a different mother. One to Hagar, a maidservant to Sarai later named Sarah, and they called Hagar's son, Ishmael. The other son, born to Abrahams wife Sarah, and they called Sarah's son, Isaac.

The account begins with Ishmael in Genesis 16 --

Now Sarai, Abram's wife, had borne him no children. But she had an Egyptian maidservant named Hagar; so she said to Abram, "The Lord has kept me from having children. Abram, sleep with my maidservant; perhaps I can build a family through her." Abram agreed to what Sarai said. So after Abram had been living in Canaan ten years, Sarai his wife took her Egyptian maidservant Hagar and gave her to her husband to be his wife. he slept with Hagar, and she conceived. When she know she was pregnant, she began to despise her mistress. Then Sarai siad to Abram, "You are responsible for the wrong I am suffering. I put my servant in your arms, and now that she knows she is pregnant, she despises me. May the Lord judge between you and me. "your servant is in your hands." Abram said, "Then Sarai mistreated Hagar; so she fled from her. The angel of the Lord found Hagar near a spring in the desert; it was the spring that is beside the road to shur. And he said, "Hagar, servant of Sarai, where have you come from, and where are you going?" "I am running away from my mistress Sarai." She answered. Then the angel of the Lord told her, "Go back to your mistress and submit to her." The angel added, "I will so increase your descendants that they will be too numerous to count." The angel of the Lord also said to her: "You are now with child and you will have a son. You shall name him Ishmael, for the Lord has heard of your misery. He will be a wild donkey of a man; his hand will be against everyone and everyone's hand against him, and he will live in hostility toward all his brothers. She gave this name to the Lord who spoke to her: "You are the God who sees me," for she said, "I have now seen the One who sees me." That is why the well was called Beer Lahai Roi; it is still there, between Kadesh and Bered. So Hagar bore Abram a son, and Abram gave the name Ishmael to the son she had borne. Abram was eighty-six years old when Hagar bore him Ishmael.

Ok, so this is the starting point for which the two lines of people had their beginnings. The first line beginning with Hagar. Now, if you noticed, in verse 12 of Genesis 16 God says that, "Ishmael will be against everyone and everyone against him, which means that the line of Ishmael's people will be warring people all their lives.

Why is this? God explains this and His plan. Further in chapter 17. When He delivers news to Abram now Abraham, that Sarai soon to be Sarah will bear a child.

Genesis 17:19-21

Then God said, "Yes, but but your wife Sarah will bear you a son, and you will call him Isaac. I will establish my covenant with him as an everlasting covenant for this descendants after him. And as for Ishmael, I have heard you; I will surely bless him; I will make him fruitful and will greatly increase his numbers. He will be the father of twelve rulers, and I will make him into a great nation. but my covenant I will establish with Isaac, whom Sarah will bear to you by this time next year.

As the account continues, Sarah becomes afraid and in disbleief at what God had revealed to her, due to her old age, so she laughed and He returned to her and questioned her and she lied, "I didnot laugh," but He said, "Yes, you did laugh."

So, Ishmael is born to Hagar. Isaac born to Sarah. And ... as God had told Hagar, her son Ishmael and his offspring would live in hostility toward everyone is later confirmed, 137 years later...at Ishmael's death.

Genesis 25:17-18

Altogether, Ishmael lived a hundred and thirty-seven years. he breathed his last and died, and he was gathered to his people. His descendants settled in the area from Havilah to Shur. Near the border of Egypt, as yu go toward Egypt, as you go toward Asshur. And they lived in hostility toward all their brothers.

And they lived in hostility toward all their brothers.

And they still do to this day. There's your Muslim roots, friends. The lineage of Ishmael.

Why the two different lineages?
Why does the covenant fall on Isaac and not on Ishmael too?

The most likely reason - to give us exemplaries down through the generations as to how to live our lives according to what God's Word teaches through Isaac's lineage, and through Ishmael's line to show us the difference.

Despite the continuing war and rumors of war; it will continue to the end as it always has.

The difference is clear!

I'm going to continue to research this, so this will probably be one in a series of posts on this topic.

A work in progress.

So, be in prayer with me, as God will continue His blessings of wisdom, that we may better do His will.

God bless!

Update: Ok, I've just found out something new, and make a slight correction: Ishmael is considered 'offspring' of Abraham, instead of a son, since he was born through a sinful relationship. It is Isaac who is considered the only rightful heir which all Christians are the lineage of.

~Jeremiah

Thanks for visiting Conservatives United!

2007 Deadliest Year Since 1989 for Police Officers

You can read the full story here.

These crimes are mostly by legally born Americans, but children with no upbringing, usually because of divorce, and no interest or care for the children....and, thus, children who become entrapped to their so called "friends" within the community related to law-breaking gangs.

This is more reason why we need a much more strict code of justice, for those who want to commit crimes against humanity. Otherwise the crime rate will just continue to rise beyond the point that any means of civility will be impossible. In effect, turning our country into a full blown civil war.

There's that side of it, but on the other side, of equal importance, is a much larger factor, or threat, if you will...

Now, much to the jargon of the Left, about Islam being the "religion of peace" and everything, we see quite the opposite picture with last week's chain of events at the passing of Benazir Bhutto. This, combined with a rising number of Moslems, and terrorist threats against the United States by them, does not spell good news.

How we take steps to address these issues will decide how the country as a whole can move forward, by making America safe once again. The first step, I believe, is in the immigration issue, we must reduce immigration from Nations such as Iran, Syria, and the surrounding territories. And to that effect, we reduce the likeliehood of terrorists getting into the U.S., and thus, thwart future terrorist attacks. That's the first step.

Secondly, we have to deal with those that are already in the country--thus, we must tighten down on the activities of those who practice the Islamic religion; by making ourselves more aware of what plans and events that are being carried out in the Moslem gathering centers. Although, we do have the wiretapping programs in place, it can't cover what the ears can't hear, and the eyes can't see. So, there must be some intelligence in place that can monitor the activities of these areas. If cameras are necessary, then so be it. The benefits will far outweigh the risks in this case.

What we do beyond this, regarding the situation of our Native citizenry who commit crimes against humanity, will have to be taken into consideration after a review of the current laws on the books. Now, I know I can't make that decision, for I'm not well versed on procedure, but it seems to me, that far too much time is spent in the Court room, on present cases, and less time on bringing justice to our streets. The reason I say this, is because I have to go by what the great Judges and Kings of Old had to say about the issue, in which case, they were guidance came from the Supreme Judge...For example, In the book of Ecclesiasties 8:11-by King Solomon-

When the sentence for a crime is not quickly carried out, the hearts of the people are filled with schemes to do wrong. Although a wicked man commits a hundred crimes and still lives a long time, I know that it will go better with God-fearing men, who are reverent before God.

So, with the present crime wave, we can only presume one thing, and that, to be precise, our justice system is delivering, purposfully, partiality, on behalf of their own wants and desires; and not for the benefit of the people and their neighborhoods.

How can this be? How could our elected officials be hoodwinked by their own appointees like this?

It all boils down to this one fact - Activist Liberalism. Yes, Liberalism, in its pleasing, deceiving message, has blinded the people eyes to the reality around them. They say? If I can swindle the government every month, "who cares"?

See?

If there was ever a disaster to befall this country, it was whenever welfare and other entitlement programs were enacted enslaving the people to our own government and not putting them to work to help themselves. Just simply put, it is Socialism. Thus, we have created more dead-beat parents, which leads to the fact of increased rates of crime, and furthermore, increased promiscuity and abortions.

Don't you see, folks, governmental dependency is adding to our problems, not fixing them.

This is the way it should be, in the order as follows...

1. Eliminate welfare and other entitlements = increase in working families = more responsibility = better raised children = less crime.

In that order.

Have at it...

~ Jeremiah

Fmr. PM BENAZIR BHUTTO ASSASSINATED

RAWALPINDI,

Pakistan — Pakistani opposition leader Benazir Bhutto was killed Thursday in a suicide attack as she drove away from a campaign rally just minutes after addressing thousands of supporters, aides said.

The death of the charismatic former prime minister threw the campaign for the Jan. 8 election into chaos and created fears of mass protests and an eruption of violence across the volatile south Asian nation.

This certainly raises a lot of questions as to the future progress of democracy within the Greater Middle East. Opposition Leader Bhutto's only desire was for the spread and survival of democracy for the Pakinstani people there, and Freedom to prosper.

What a sad day for the people of Pakistan!

This can prove only one thing, friends, that despite those of us who wish for the good of mankind, that this should be as a reminder that the fight for freedom is a neverending struggle against the ones like the ones who've committed this atrocity against their own people. That our fight is not against flesh and blood, but against the evil one who plants thoughts of bloodshed and violence in the hearts of those without a personal relationship with Christ who died to set us free from our inherent sinful nature.

As in the words of former Great President Ronald Reagan--

The real crisis we face today is a spiritual one; at root, it is a test of moral will and faith. Whittaker Chambers, the man whose own religious conversion made him a "witness" to one of the terrible traumas of or age, the Hiss-Chambers case, wrote that the crisis of the Western world exists to the degree in which the West is indifferent to God, the degree to which it collaborates in communism's attempt to make man stand alone without God."

"For Marxism-Lininism is actually the second-oldest faith, he said, first proclaimed in the Garden of Eden with the words of temptation "Ye shall be as gods." The western world can answer this challenge, he wrote, "but only provided that its faith in God and the freedom he enjoins is as great as communism's faith in man."

We fail to rise to this test, and we fail to answer God's call to us for spreading His blessing of freedom to the less fortunate people(s) in this cruel world? We fail to bring justice to the unjust barbarians of extremist view, at the peril of our own blessing of freedom.

~ Jeremiah

Remembrance!

As Christmas day approaches it is a time for all of God's people to join together in celebration of Our Lord's birth. On Christmas Eve many participate in Christmas Carols and Festivities, in the singing of hymns of praise and song to the King of kings. While others are preparing the dinner table, making cakes, cookies, and all sorts of goodies. Still others are wrapping gifts for Christmas Morning. All symbolic of the Greatest Gift of them all, born in a manger, in Bethlehem ... Jesus!

On another note, there are many of our Brothers and Sisters that are not as fortunate, who are enduring great persecution and suffering around the world by those of the Muslim community whom practice Islam/Jihad - a "Holy War", in which much violence is perpetrated against whom they claim, "infidels" in the Christian community. When in reality it is the Muslims who are the infidels, not believing in the Divine power of God's One and Only Son Jesus Christ who died once for all, that all men would turn from their wicked ways. You see, friends, Ours is a Holy War also, so we can turn this around on those of the Muslim community who practice Islam, only for Christians ... We don't fight for God by Murdering, because we don't have to, it's not a physical/political battle, it is a Spiritual one; and if we remain true to Christ, then He says that He will go before us, and fight for us, so we can leave our burdens with Him, and He'll work things out for the good of His people; as long we put our full faith and trust in Him and Him alone!

So, In this Christmas Season, please remember our Brothers and Sisters around the world, that God may comfort them and that He will give them the strength to endure their suffering...and let us also pray that they may remain faithful to the Lord during their troubled times...never losing sight of their Hope that is in Christ Jesus!

God bless,
~ Jeremiah